~ Open letter to Katherine Drake ~
Monetary penalties fines enforcement Tasmania Police

Dear Katherine, as you would be now aware that Clemencia's 'case' was held on 8th August for driving with her licence suspended by your office resulted in a fine by Magistrate Marron.

I am not sure of the 'policy' that is in place in your organisation. That is to say, whether a further ‘disqualify’ will arise when she again fails to pay the fine or not so I simply drop you this note as an act of courtesy.

I again write to you because according to THE LAW of the Constitution by which you and your organisation are bound, any 'fine' imposed by a subordinate magistrates court concerning a Constitutional matter will ahead be seen as further COERCION to force Clemencia to fund a system against her conscience in an attempt to have her to defy-deny her belief, faith, religious ideology AND God.

That criminal ACT is forbidden by the Constitution. Indeed you are coercing Clemencia an absolute pacifist into funding a 'warring and punitive' system against her conscience and BELIEF.

Please read the below sent to the magistrate as well as the attached sent to the Commonwealth DPP in reference to her this weeks case of the ATO v/s Clemencia which commenced some days ago on the12th August.

As I see it, a person placing a complaint before a magistrate in a lower court, being a person who has been advised beforehand that IT is a matter for the High Court ONLY, is not only themselves 'guilty of non-disclosure of FACTS’ to the magistrate but further, IF the magistrate has also been forewarned, then they are all COMPLICIT to said illegality and therefore GUILTY OF TREASON.

Since the Hobart commonwealth DPP received my ‘advisory’ email setting out these FACTS on July 26th (attached) a good two weeks prior to the case at Launceston and as the 'department officers' simply went ahead in spite of being so informed, it shows that the DPP officers are LEADING and misleading magistrate Simon Brown into unknowingly becoming COMPLICIT to anarchy and treason as they attempted to get his ‘lower court’ to deal with a Constitutional matter which is beyond his JURISDICTION.

In fact magistrate Simon Brown has already now become complicit because he began the ‘hearing’ on the 12th and he is either in ‘cahoots’ with the DPP or in complete ignorance of the facts which he should have been advised of. This is a very serious matter indeed and I hope ‘someone’ alerts him to this matter before he puts his own head in a noose at the next sitting on January 12th 2015. 

As I see it, a criminal conspiracy exists in the halls of power. Very shortly my 'case' against said persons will be completed and they will find themselves in the 'dock' and be even MORE terrified than is poor Clemencia when she is so disadvantaged. Indeed, anarchy and treason are the most heinous of crimes having the heaviest penalties against those committing said crimes.

At present, your name is not on my list of persons openly 'complicit' to said illegal extortion of money attempt however, if Clemencia ahead finds that she is again halted by the police due to her licence being again suspended by your office then your name as decision maker of said act will surely be listed on my complaint sheet since as an ACCOMPLICE in the attempt to extort money illegally via the use of the suspension of free movement. All this is illegal COERCION.

Please NOTE, the fact that a magistrate 'empowers' your office as a consequence of their own errors does NOT legitimise your actions especially since you have had the FACTS of the matter disclosed to you.

Further to the above, please try and SEE that when you use coercion in an attempt to try and force another to change their religious ideology thereby forcing them to go against their conscience, faith, belief, you are NO different to the terrorist Islamic sectors who say to the 'Christian' sects:

"Change your belief to Islam by vowing so to us or - - - lose your head."  

Madam, I am NOT seeking 'Justice or punishment' - - - I am seeking the elevation of the consciousness of mankind through EDUCATION to the FACTS of LIFE and reality of THE LAW of God's ENERGY so that everyone has the opportunity to become kinder to THEMSELVES.

Ignorance of God's 'eye for an eye' or 'equal return' LAW is NOT 'bliss.'
Ignorance of the true meaning of the Constitutional 'Freedom of religion' acts is NOT 'bliss.'

Sincerely – Terence

From: Terence
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 11:55 AM
To: Magistrates Launceston
Subject: Truth on C. Barnes case 8th Aug


Dear Marlene, please pass this very important letter on to magistrate Marron. Please also advise me that you are able to do this -

Sincerely – Terence de Malaherre

~ The Judgement of the Court & my response to all mankind ~
This is an educational document

In reference to the judgement delivered against Clemencia Barnes by magistrate Reg. Marron on 8th August 2014 I state: Magistrate Marron made a number of 'grave' errors of judgement in this case because:

1 - The primary aspect of the case was the failure to pay a monetary penalty FINE.

2 - The secondary aspect of the case was the punitive driver disqualification imposed by the state under the traffic act for the failure to pay said fine.

3 - The third aspect of this case arose when Mrs. Barnes was 'found' to be driving whilst disqualified. This third aspect then became the FOCAL point in the mind of the magistrate who remained oblivious to the OVERRIDING primary factor.

What then were the ERRORS of his 'case' judgement?

a) - Magistrate Marron failed to see that the defence was based upon the FACTS being that; within '1' (primary aspect) above Clemencia had IMMUNITY from persecution and prosecution within the Constitutional 'Freedom of Religion' clauses. Being the immunity and protection 'promised' to THE PEACEFUL by the Constitutional Sovereign Powers of the institution the magistrate serves.

The 'fine' and subsequent driver disqualification would or could have been dismissed by the High Court judges having the powers of jurisdiction over constitutional affairs.

b) - Magistrate Marron failed to see that a magistrates court is 'secondary' and is not entitled to 'judge' constitutional matters.

c) - Magistrate Marron clearly stated that he had 'examined' the traffic act used and compared IT to the constitutional acts and then came to his decision. Magistrate Marron does not see that he has NO powers and NO authority to 'judge' anything in contravention of the constitutional rules/acts/laws.

d) - Magistrate Marron should have told the prosecutor to take his complaint to the High Court.  

The fine was imposed illegally by magistrate Marron. The consequences now arising from Clemencia not paying the fines will increase due to his punitive and ILLEGAL action and unconstitutional procedure. It also follows that the police (backed by the magistrate) are complicit in carrying out the illegal activity of religious intolerance and persecution backed by threat and coercion and intimidation.

Regrettably magistrate Marron and many other Tasmanian magistrates have FOUND the JUSTIFICATION to exceed their judicial powers because they are apparently not aware of said powers or they choose to ignore them. Either way, ignorance of THE LAW is not bliss, as everyone is to now find out.


The magistrate wears the 'cloak' of an honest and judicious person, so I can only HOPE that he soon awakens and sees his ERRORS because he has a compassionate heart. Magistrate Marron is extremely ignorant of the FACTS in relation to his POWERS to 'execute' punitive measures against THE PEACEFUL who do NOT disturb the peace and who also do NOT disobey the SUPERIOR RULINGS of the Constitution as does he.

Magistrate Marron is unknowingly 'aiding and abetting' monetary EXTORTION & illegal punishment.

Woe indeed for magistrates backed by armed men, for they unknowingly place a very cold, hard and agonising penalty upon their own heads within God's absolute Justice to be 'executed' by God when He so decides. The 'Sword of Damocles' is sharp indeed.



Open letter to Lara Giddings lara.giddings@parliament.tas.gov.au 

Dear Lara, thank you for your reply to my outreach - in fact it went out to all Australian politicians, and you were the only one to respond.

Lara, I am a minister of God's Word and teacher of spiritual truth and head of the on line global 'One True Faith' outreach program.

I am Mrs Barnes spiritual advisor and legal counsel in respect of her Constitutional rights. Clemencia is an absolute pacifist. and does her best to obey God's Command of peace & love & mercy & compassion at all times and in all situations.

It follows that for Clemencia to remain faithful and true to her conscience, ideological belief and God, she cannot support nor fund by taxes or fines any person or institution having the contra religious ideological belief in control, subjugation, punishment, causing of harm or waging war, as in her opinion it would be a contravention of said command of God.

As an absolute pacifist Clemencia further believes that any forceful or injurious or punitive activity is 'terrorism,' and she cannot fund such activity which in her opinion is no less than 'official' war waged upon other members of the community. (herself included)

I am a very concerned citizen because in reference to my words in the prior letter to you I did state:

Even here in Tasmania, the police are interfering in the lives of the peaceful, and they are backed by dishonourable magistrates who fine, punish and jail people who have not disturbed the peace and who are living within the constraints of the 'laws' of the Constitution. (Never disturbing the peace)

Indeed, these magistrates exceed their judicial powers and mandate as they 'hear' and judge matters beyond their JURISDICTION. This is TREASON, and none of these mortals 'gives a damn.'

Why am I concerned? Because again this very week, (Court 3 on 8th Aug) Clemencia Barnes was 'convicted' of an 'assumed' offence by magistrate Reg. Marron who totally ignored her RIGHTS of immunity granted by the Constitutional 'Freedom of religion' clause and he simply chose to impose a fine on her.

In so doing he convicted himself as Treasonable and exceeding the powers of his 'lower court' jurisdiction, as he 'judged' a matter of 'faith and ideological conduct,' being a constitutional matter beyond his jurisdiction and, he also ignored the primary causal factor leading up to the matter brought before him by the equally ignorant prosecutor.

This in fact gives the police 'licence' to continue in their religious persecution and interfere in her affairs and to continue to demand money from her in a coercive attempt to force her to change her religious ideological belief in supporting their contra 'ways.' This is again a 'forbidden by law' treasonable activity leading to civil unrest.

Launceston police prosecutor Brett Steele sees my 'outreaches' as being of no value in his words to magistrate Marron when asked to read the statement of submission. Regrettably the police as yet FAIL to see their own treasonable activities.

They also fail to see that I AM their only 'friend' doing his best to awaken them from their reverie, for they see NOT that all their punitive activities are causing harm and become a due upon their own 'heads' within God's immutable and JUST 'eye for an eye' Law. It is now the time for education rather than vindictive warmongering, causing pain, emotional trauma and financial loss to community members..

It is obvious to me that there are NO Tasmanian magistrates who know anything about their legal rights or otherwise to 'judge' matters of belief, conscience or religious ideology and ALL transgress THE LAWS they swear an oath to uphold. They, backed by force of arms, (police) simply impose their rulings in total arrogance and in ignorance of their ILLEGAL activities, seeing NOT the most severe consequences for themselves. 

Are you able to please advise me to 'whom' magistrates are 'beholden' or to whom I need to direct a complaint so that they are brought into LINE through EDUCATION.

I attach my open and on line response to the magistrates judgement which I sent to his secretary today.

Sincerely - Terence

There is a copy of this email on line as:

Update - 14  - The Judgement of the Court & my response for all mankind at: