~ Open letter to Mrs. Agnese Saracino (JP) ~
Reference: Illegal Summons (Complaint 1590494 - C. Barnes)
Dear Madam, by now you should be aware of the FACT that the case against Mrs. Barnes is a matter of faith, conscience, belief and the religious ideology of absolute pacifism. Any 'conflict' of ideologies is a matter coming within or under the jurisdiction of the Constitutional 'Freedom of Religion' Acts.
Constitutional matters cannot be LEGALLY placed before or 'heard or judged' in a Petty Court because matters of Religious belief must only be attended to in or by the High Court of Australia.
I need you to be aware that I am formulating a complaint of treasonable ACTIONS being carried out by members of the judiciary and others including yourself to be given to the Police Commissioner soon.
I need to advise you that your PRIMARY 'signature' as a JP (Justice of THE PEACE) placed on the Summons is an act which has authorised and thus 'legalised' an ILLEGAL attack upon a peaceful member of the community, one who has NOT disturbed the peace in any way.
The fact that you received a complaint from some 'other' member of the Australian community is NOT 'reason enough' for you to ASSUME their 'legitimacy' or otherwise, and for YOU to instigate CRIMINAL and PUNITIVE proceedings against a peaceful person without looking deeper into the process is judicial neglect.
Since you 'claim' to BE a Justice of THE PEACE, you should be upholding THE PEACE and NOT taking steps to DISTURB THE PEACE of another for and on behalf of a very vindictive and deluded person backed by his very arrogant peers. (Eddie Storace, a mentally disturbed person needing help)
In my opinion, since the summons you signed had NO 'named' JP or number printed on IT below your illegible signature, the document is already 'invalid but regrettably, the Launceston Registrar has already 'set' a hearing date and thus has joined in with the 'witch hunt' of the persecution of a peaceful person.
For your information, Mrs. Clemencia Barnes is in FACT living within her RIGHTS within the Constitutional AUTHORITY and thus WITHIN THE LAW of the institution you are supposed to serve judiciously.
It is her RIGHT to live according to THE Command of God and therefore she cannot fund warmongers because that would make her complicit to their defiance of God as they 'disturb the peace' of others and cause harm, destruction and the killing of God's children.
"Not in my name and not on my behalf" is Clemencia's motto.
Indeed you may assume that this fact is irrelevant and that it is up to the magistrate to 'clarify' that but, - - - what you and ALL need to SEE is that if YOU legalise a complaint and place IT (the case) before the INCORRECT Court, knowing that ONLY the High Court is 'licensed' to hear constitutional matters, YOU are treating Clemencia with CONTEMPT and YOU are 'tempting' or enticing an ignorant of the facts Petty Court magistrate to 'try' her and YOU become COMPLICIT to an illegal gathering as well as aiding and abetting an illegal TRIAL.
I ASK and 'advise,' - - - before this 'case' is 'heard' and thereby PROVING your own GUILT in instigating IT by authorising IT, thereby proving your GUILT and complicity to an unlawful and uncivil and treasonable activity, would you like to write a letter of 'summons retraction' or withdrawal of the summons you authorised?
If so, please simply write a letter to the Launceston registrar Roger Illingworth with cc to David House his assistant stating that you erred through ignorance and as you now see that, since Clemencia is living within her rights within THE LAW and, - - - since this case can only be legally 'tried' in the High Court that you wish for the summons to be nullified and the 'hearing date' immediately withdrawn.
If you do this then please send me a copy by email so I may advise Clemencia of it. You will also need to advise the complainant Ed Storace that as you are now AWARE of THE FACT that it is a matter for the High Court ONLY, and you suggest that he place a fresh complaint with the High Court of Australia if he so wishes to continue to try and DENY Clemencia her civil and constitutional RIGHTS.
Agnese, I am giving you this opportunity to 'save yourself,' for IF you do nothing, and on the date of the hearing Clemencia is 'called' to stand before the magistrate to be 'heard' then, - - - at that very moment, everyone in the 'chain' from Ed Storace, yourself, registry clerks, police and the magistrate become complicit to an illegal and treasonable gathering and the consequences of this will BE far reaching indeed. If you are later interested in 'what' said consequences are to BE, I can also advise you of THAT.
Please use your own CONSCIENCE and research because IF you rely on others 'thoughts' you may fail. I give the relevant constitutional acts 'supposedly' protecting Clemencia and guaranteeing her 'peace' through being a peaceful person of moral standing.
For your 'interest' Ed Storace is a self-proven' criminal having the intent to permanently destroy or 'nullify' or VOID the constitutional Freedom of Religion Acts and he is already 99% there. Please do NOT assist him to accomplish IT with your 'help' through your ignorance of what you are doing.
Eddie Storace and his ATO peers have been 'savagely' and ILLEGALLY attacking Clemencia now for over 15 years as attested by my over 37 letters on this matter which are all on line for public scrutiny on the link below. The ATO was informed in writing of her decision to be totally obedient to her conscience, faith, belief in God and His commanded code of conduct POLICY, and thus could no longer support or fund any punitive or warring ideology.
Presently, the ATO officials and all of 'you' involved in this persecution are using taxation legislation that is INCONSISTENT with the Freedom of Religion Acts of the Constitution and as such, the taxation legislation is INVALID.
Since the 'conflict' is a matter of a difference of ideological belief, conscience, faith and THUS 'religion,' the taxation 'complainant' who is 'blind' to the TRUTH that people have RIGHTS to live by their peaceful ideological belief must place their complaint in respect of their contra 'warring ideological belief' before the High Court.
Please now take my advice when I state that 'as' a Justice of THE Peace, you should ONLY be summonsing persons who have been reported as having factually disturbed the peace of others. These need to be summonsed to attend an educative counselling seminar session but NOT for the purpose of their punishment or monetary extortion. (Fines)
It needs to be clearly understood by everyone that persons who are in 'conflict' situations such as family violence are no different to those as Eddie Storace. For he is 'incensed' by feelings of power to such a degree that he cannot rationalise his actions and he is prepared to do his best to cause harm to a peaceful 70 year old 'granny' simply because his mind has become 'unbalanced,' irrational and vindictive to the EXTREME.
If this 'case' is heard at Launceston and a punitive 'penalty' is imposed then it is proof to all Australians that JUDICIAL ANARCHY exists and civil unrest will follow because every PEACEFUL person will KNOW that their lives will be interfered with as was Clemencia's by arrogant anarchists backed by armed 'policemen' seeking to steal money and cause harm.
I also send a copy of this outreach to the ATO officials as well as the Launceston registrar because any one of them also then has the opportunity of 'awaking' from their 'reverie' and becoming honourable to their own souls and halting this unconscionable, treasonable, iniquitous and ungodly process.
Sincerely - Terence
There is a copy of this letter on line as ITEM 38 at: