~ The END of the Story ~
Reference my 'case' judgement
at St. Helens court on 4th November 2015
When a magistrate (Mrs.
Cure) in 'open' court states that she has read my defence but, - - -
states that its content, on line linked at page end, has no 'relevancy' in
her mind, it is a CLEAR indication that she, like many, has
absolutely NO 'idea' or comprehension as to the meaning of or
validity of THE Constitution.
that the Constitution has NO relevance in this case is FALSE because HER belief
means she can recklessly deny me my Judicial Right to Protection, a right which is
my Constitutional Right. She also
herself defies THE limited mandate of
THE Constitution which DENIES
lower courts of petty sessions the right to hear
cases of conscience, belief and
Why does she this do?
Simply because she is even more 'drunk' on 'Power' than the
aborigine lass she snidely 'condemned' for being unable to hold her 'likker'
due to that 'failing' on the part of the 'Aborigine race.' The young
lass was already being assisted with
good counsel and did not need the hefty
'fine' as was imposed, because no doubt she could not afford it and
with its added 'worry' imposition it would probably lead her back to
also publicly stated that her State RULES
be administered in her
'lower' court of petty sessions.
This is true but this does not alter the reality of the truth of my defence
because she does not
see nor accept
that cases of Religious Ideology
cannot be heard or judged
legally in any court other
than the High Court.
illegally using State rules against me
in her court of 'petty sessions' she tries to 'rob' me of my absolute right to
live by my conscience and religious ideology,
and imposes punishment illegally
in taking over the 'role' of the appropriate court, The High Court.
Why is it I 'wonder' that I
spend hundreds of hours exposing the errors of the day when Police
and magistrates cannot comprehend the written WORD of THE
Constitutional Acts I place before them? Do none comprehend
the English language?
Why is it that magistrate
Cure placed an 'insane' fine of $2,500 upon my 'head' when I made it
CLEAR that according to my pacifist philosophy, belief, faith and
religious ideology that for me to fund 'her' punitive system would,
to me, be defiance of God's Command, and it was
the reason why
I could not pay fines?
In fact, why would I so do
knowing that I then would be complicit to her (As my servant)
imposing fines upon so many others in the community and
thereby I would become complicit to her causing them
harm on my behalf? I did state that I was an
happy to fund any
benign community effort.
Magistrate 'Cure' justifies
her extortion attempt at stealing money in fines due to my
receiving a 'pension.' She sees not and knows not that I work very
hard both day and night counselling mentally disturbed community
members for FREE (monetarily) as my 'time' is 'priceless' and
that it is THE 'peoples' money funding me, it is not
the 'State's' money. The wages of all public servants are
also paid for by THE PEOPLE and not one 'penny' is the 'State's'
The 'outcome' of this
'case' is now THE PROOF that the Australian and Tasmanian Constitution has
become null and void. It automatically FOLLOWS that the National
Flag has FALLEN in disgrace and that NO official has ANY
'legitimacy' to carry out their duties.
It also follows that
communist Dictators have seized
control of the land ILLEGALLY in
defiance of THE Sovereign Power.
It also highlights that State RULE now
because it is backed by armed forces
men (Police) who are all now
treasonable anarchists waging WAR upon
the people because they have sided with said
Being those court of petty
sessions magistrates from whom they now take
their orders from and support, rather than
supporting THE Constitutional
THE PEOPLE from 'white collar'
Any person who now
picks UP the 'cudgel' to 'report' me to the 'mad' magistrate when I
am NOT 'disturbing the peace; "Is to
DIE in the underworld" says God
When I was a 'copper' in
Africa in the 1960's I was a 'stickler' for upholding THE LAW. I
'wonder' 'why' the Tasmania Police are UNAWARE of the FACT that
their Mandate to operate and to 'Police' stems from THE
Constitution? Not from State rules. Do they truly not
that Constitutional matters relating to the Freedom of Religion
cannot be LEGALLY heard in the lower court?
I did advise the magistrate
that I could not pay fines because according to my religious
ideological belief I could not fund (fine payments) to any person or
organisation that was
causing harm to people. Six Tasmania
Police officers listened to magistrate Cure
threaten me coercively
as she stated: I could fine you $18,000 and
jail you and if you do not obey the decrees of the court you will
go to jail if I see you again.
What none of the
Police understood by the
magistrates threatening statement is that she
was in FACT trying to coerce
into defying my
religious ideology of pacifism. This is a blatant IMPOSITION
whereby the magistrate is using ‘her own
in a ‘supposed’ UNBIASED 'case’ by attempting
to force me to join her punitive ideology.
What the magistrate fails to
see clearly is her OWN bias
since, by forcing
people to change their 'religious ideology' she is
in fact making an attempt to ‘legally impose
constriction of Religious Beliefs and observance.’
This is an
attempt, one that is a
FORBIDDEN activity which can be clearly seen
as set out within
the Acts of the Constitution. I 'wonder' if or when someone in the
PEACE force will
comprehend what I am stating, for if I was in 'uniform' I would have had
HER 'arrested' for her illegal defiance
of THE Constitution Acts
The Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act (9th July 1900) section 116 clearly
shall not make any law for
any religion, or for
imposing any religious observance,
prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, -
The Constitution Act 1934 (Tasmania) states:
This document includes a legal guarantee of the religious liberty and equality of Tasmanians. Every citizen is guaranteed freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion under Section 46(1) of this Act.
Part V - General provisions - Religious freedom
46. (1) Freedom of conscience and the free profession and practice of religion are, subject to public order and morality, guaranteed to every citizen.
(2) No person shall be subject to any disability, - on account of his religion or religious belief.
NO State rules/laws can be
LEGALLY used to nullify or void or avoid the above Constitutional
ACTS. The fact that my 'case' was even presented to and heard and
judged by a subordinate court of petty sessions using STATE laws
was/is an ILLEGAL ACTIVITY.
Regrettably, the PEACE
CORPS Police are being used ILLEGALLY and seem oblivious to that
fact and equally oblivious to their own TERRIBLE FATE to be, as our
invisible God's Wrath now explodes over the planet for the reasons
and in the manner delineated on my web site.
Since magistrate 'Cure' was
given the FACTS of the 'case' in my defence pages and she chose to exceed her
mandate and defy the constitutional authority, she has proven to God, man and
the local Police present that she is a
treasonable anarchist taking a
false wage and she must be
'dishonourably discharged' because she is NOT 'fit' to be a public servant in
That is the judgement
of my 'pen' and albeit there are 'few' who would believe that I am God's END
DAYS 'Judge,' the judgement of my pen (God's) is always FINAL. I add, any
'police' persons who follows or upholds the 'orders' from the pen of
magistrate 'Cure' is complicit and will suffer the same consequence as she is
due to endure.
exists and is what everyone
DEMANDS, including our God as
all will now see. His LAW is very SIMPLE:
What YOU do unto others will
BE done unto YOU on an EQUAL and thus 'eye for an eye' basis.
As you sow so shall ye reap
- for every action there IS an equal and opposite reaction.
punishment leads to monetary extortion,
- - - backed and enabled by the PEACE
CORPS. People such as magistrates who
rely on 'force of arms' to back up their monetary 'claims'
are all defiant of God.
'safe,' the Police
must now revert back to
pacifist role of ONLY hauling in persons who do
PEACE or who are carrying out
activities and have them EDUCATED. Police must now ignore State politicians and
their rules and their magistrates and ONLY
Uphold the Peace and uphold the Law of the 'Freedom of
All the rules or decrees or laws
of MAN having any punitive 'attachments' are in contravention of God's
Command and all upholding such are
GUILTY of defiance of God and have placed
themselves within the punitive
aspect of God's immutable 'eye for an eye' Law.
The Sovereign Power (God) who gave man the
'freedom' to be left in peace if they were peaceful as I am, will
HIS 'strictures' upon all THE UNFAITHFUL say I. Most terrible
indeed is the FATE of errant man now to BE as seen by ME.
My 'job' for God is now DONE and it is entirely up to THE INDIVIDUAL
as to their final spiritual destination, be it UP or DOWN and I simply repeat
the 100% pass mark required by God as being: "Peace
and love and mercy" is the ONLY WAY to the
I give a simple explanation
of the role and meaning of THE CONSTITUTION of the governing
system of Australia - UK.
The Constitution is simply a document raised up by past
community elders to bring 'orderliness' to the unruliness and chaos that existed
in every land. The Constitution was invoked so that
PEACE would exist, and in
order to facilitate this, man invoked LAWS which were simply the
decrees of those
bearing 'force of arms,' and any persons who disobeyed were punished.
The chaos spoken of was due to many persons having
differences of OPINION and differing ideological beliefs, (religions) and
initially, there was only a single 'factor' required being, that everyone
would be left in peace and undisturbed as long as they did not
disturb the peace nor engaged in any immoral activity.
So the constitutional DOCUMENT was raised up and IT was
and yet is the 'licence' or MANDATE
legalising all officials to go about their
business. There was and yet is only ONE 'proviso' LIMITING their
authority to interfere or control or punish.
This LIMITATION was and yet is the
'Freedom of Religion' ACTS.
These acts clearly state that;
1 - Individuals who LIVE
in accordance with the: "subject to" clause therein and who
thus live in a moral way and never
disturb the peace WILL BE PROTECTED by
the Sovereign powers.
2 - Individuals who disturb the peace
or who engage in immoral activities
will be subjected to the punitive
laws of State.
It needs to be CLEARLY understood by
the Police 'enforcers' that IF or WHEN the
peaceful of moral disposition
are being persecuted using State
rules, that ANARCHY
exists and that of itself, this treasonable anarchy
is illegal, unlawful, criminal
'chaos' in action.
needs to be CLEARLY understood by the Police
'enforcers' that if they are involved in any way in this activity that
they are COMPLICIT, and that they will suffer the 'dire'
consequences for denying others their LAWFUL Right
to live peacefully as God commands and to
NOT be forced or coerced
through jail or other punishment to change their ideology to that
of the VINDICTIVE warmongers by supporting or
funding their merciless and punitive ways.
It needs to be CLEARLY understood by the Police
'enforcers' that not ONE State rule or law applies to a person living in
accordance with the precepts of the "Subject to" clause of the
'Freedom of Religion' ACTS.
They have the RIGHT to go 'fishing' without being
taxed by having to pay a $50 fishing licence. They have the RIGHT to only
participate in funding benign community effort
of their own choosing.
Naturally they have to pay for the use
of essential services they use, be it hospitals, schools, roads, plumber
or electrician etc. They know that their God owns 'all' and sees 'all' and they
thus bow in subservience to Him and His commands and they 'treat'
all others with respect and they NEVER cause harm nor punish others, they only
do their best to educate offenders.
- 2 :
I only use the constitutional acts to assist everyone who is a supporter of THE
punitive aspects of the SYSTEM of which I am NOT. I simply use the Constitution to show the 'enforcers' that within
their OWN 'system' I am living as required.
I am a 'follower' of God and
His Command and as I AM in conformity to IT I am at 'peace' within myself as I
REFUSE to fund what to me is a
TERRORIST organisation causing harm to
God's children due to having the contra belief of
Dictionary: Communism is rule by State rules as dictated by the
'dictator.' (In this case political decree and their followers)
Link: Defence papers submitted to the magistrate
This letter document becomes
Update - 22 on page 3
Response to magistrate 'Cure's' Judgement