Letter 1 to Caroline Tang - The Examiner newspaper, Launceston 

Reference your article Examiner 9th Dec - No tax returns filed - C. Barnes

Dear Caroline, reference my phone call to you yesterday (9th Dec) in respect of the above. Neither Clemencia nor I are persons wishing to have a 'free ride' on the backs of others and we both are extremely busy people assisting many for free, and this 'case' of Clemencia's is simply to:

1 - Test the Freedom of Religion Acts of the Constitution as to their validity or otherwise.

2 - Try to live peacefully as God Commands and NOT become involved in the punitive and controlling activities of this world that take place simply because 'some' (Emperors or politicians) backed by force of arms hold a different ideological belief as they state to all and sundry:

"WE politicians are the appointed and anointed ones and therefore WE have the divine RIGHT to enforce all or any demands WE decide to impose upon you and, - - - WE will 'disturb your peace' forever if YOU fail to bow to OUR 'taxing' demands to fund OUR warrior tribe activities irrespective of what you believe! Further, we believe that you must forgo your God and your beliefs by relying solely on OUR protection."

Caroline a civil society also demands and requires peace and sanity as does the words of written Text of the Sovereign Powers who raised up the Constitution ref:

The Constitution Act 1934 (Tasmania) states:

This document includes a legal guarantee of the religious liberty and equality of Tasmanians. Every citizen is guaranteed freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion under Section 46(1) of this Act.

Part V - General provisions - Religious freedom

46. (1) Freedom of conscience and the free profession and practice of religion are, subject to public order and morality, guaranteed to every citizen.

(2) No person shall be subject to any disability, or be required to take any oath on account of his religion or religious belief.

Note: What is or is not ones religion?

Ones religion is not any of the 'named' organisations such as Islam or Christianity or Buddhism, nor is it the named individuals such as Buddha, Muhammad or Jesus espousing the Policy purportedly ordained by the invisible God.

Ones religion is ones specific ideological code of conduct Policy. A doctrinal Policy followed with great devotion in relation to a ‘way or order’ of existence. Ones religion is espoused by ones 'faith or belief' in the requirements of a supernatural being (God) or other Force. An example of this is evidenced by whether individuals choose to 'follow or engage in' WAR or PEACE.

Clemencia is also living within the 'constraints' (subject to public order and morality,) of the LIMITED Constitutional guarantee (46. (1) granted by the Sovereign powers within their own Constitution. The Constitution ONLY grants a guarantee of protection and immunity from persecution to persons who do NOT 'Disturb the peace' and who do NOT engage in immoral activities. (Drug dealing, theft etc)

The Queen's 'Courts of Tasmania' magistrates and all involved in the RELIGIOUS persecution of Clemencia Barnes (and myself) are so arrogant that they feel entitled to go forth and disturb the peace of the peaceful in direct defiance of the mandate granted unto them by said Sovereign power. It is an act of Treason and anarchy of the HIGHEST ORDER.

page 2 or 4

It is also very CLEAR to my mind that the ATO who are in collusion with the judiciary and the Police services are determined to FORCE their warring ideology (religion) down Clemencia's 'throat' as they criminally and illegally defy the Constitution of their own institution. Ref:

 The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (9th July 1900) section 116 clearly states:

"The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, -

In a previous court sitting magistrate Marron publicly explained his BELIEF in his Right to use subordinate rules even when he knows (advised by me) those subordinate 'rules/laws' are in direct ‘conflict’ with the above Constitutional Act as he stated the words;

"You are entitled to live according to your belief (godly and peaceful) - - - BUT - - - I (the magistrate) have sworn an oath to administer acts under the subordinate legislation - - - - and - - - within these rules I find you 'guilty' as charged."

You may begin to understand 'our' difficulty when courts of petty sessions magistrates don't actually READ the full text of our defence pages because, IF they so did, they would suddenly awaken to THE FACTS that indeed, their job IS to administer the rules/rulings of their subordinate State laws but, - - - such State laws cannot be used legally in matters of the constitutional freedom of religion Acts in their subordinate courts. Constitutional matters are ONLY subject to Constitutional LAW and can ONLY be LEGALLY judged in the High Court.

If a person such as Clemencia (or myself) had 'disturbed the peace,' then we would have lost our  Constitutional IMMUNITY in having voided the 'subject to' clause; ref (subject to public order and morality, guaranteed to every citizen.) In this case then and ONLY then can a subordinate court magistrate punish us in his subordinate court using State laws.

Ed Storace (ATO) and public prosecutors have been misleading or 'leading' petty sessions court magistrates astray for YEARS in KNOWINGLY placing the 'Barnes' case before ignorant magistrates who simply 'handle' anything placed on their 'plate,' but as Marron pointed out to Barnes: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse," he now needs to understand that said 'Strict Liability' actually applies to himself.

I was appointed by Clemencia Barnes 18 years ago due to her having read my first of 9 on line book 'The Testament of Truth' and due to her obvious sincerity in seeking to obey her God and her conscience I did consent to give her my full backing as is her entitlement.

The ATO prosecutor and commonwealth prosecutor have done their very best to keep me out of the picture so as to maintain their control over the magistrate as they 'advise' him of my apparent 'illegal' status to speak in Tasmanian courts, wherein in fact, I have had more dealings with THE LAW and in Courts than they have and either way, Mrs Barnes is entitled to her own choice of defence counsel.

I have been writing letters in defence of Clemencia for over 18 years and they now 'number' 50 + and are all recorded at:

page 3 of 4

The FINAL outcome to be in this case is in FACT to become the most important case to EVER be 'heard' in the 'history' of the human race because it is to do with the Salvation of the soul of mankind.

If peaceful people are to continue to be forced to go against their 'will' at 'gunpoint' with punitive measures (Jail, fine and loss of property) imposed so as to force them through fear of loss or suffering to defy the "Peace & love & mercy & forgive your enemy" Command of their God, which the judiciary are presently doing by the decree of arrogant political and judicial 'priests' backed by the Police services, then the peaceful and all involved are thus coerced into funding the contra God terrorist ideology of WAR and, - - - "They ALL go straight to Hell" say I the messenger of THE MOST HIGH.

You heard magistrate Marron speak of Clemencia's 10 page submission as to 'why' she had defied the Court order and you heard his response that; "Other than points 1 & 2 on page one, I found NOTHING to amend my views" - and he was leading up to imposing a punishment factor when you saw me then stand UP because I had prepared a 'last moment' page to submit to the court.

I enclose ITS content below (page 4 of 4) because when Clemencia was reading a copy of IT out aloud you may not have observed that magistrate Marron was also reading IT. The reality is that he 'either 'faltered' in imposing an instant judgement or he decided to LOOK DEEPER into the contents of my submission before 'leaping into the void.' What resulted as a consequence of magistrate Marron reading that document was the setting of a fresh 'Judgement' date being February 9th 2016.

We will now all await his CONSIDERED decision and I can but trust that he is MAN ENOUGH to do the right thing and send the ATO 'wolves' home or straight to jail because they themselves are making ILLEGAL use of the petty sessions court and using a Magistrate ILLEGALLY to do their 'very dirty work' for them.

Caroline, the New Age will soon be upon us once global war has reduced the planet to 'ashes,' and it is the time for all to see that we all need to fund and support benign community effort whether that involves the funding of 'benefits' wages for the elderly or schools or hospitals or roads etc., but it is also the time to recognise that those presently pretending to be our 'servants' are in fact cruel, unconscionable ARMED overlords who are merciless in their control over everyone.

They fail to see the difference between BENIGN 'pensioners' receiving funding from their own AGGRESSIVE destructive armed forces as also receiving funding.

I can assure you that IF the Constitution 'falls' or becomes INVALID to non-taxpayers simply due to them receiving benefits from THE PEOPLE, then in FACT it shows that the Constitution has already FALLEN. What follows in that scenario is that there is NO legality to anything being done by State or other officials because they ALL receive their operational mandate from the 'Sovereign' via said CONSTITUTION.

Since I believe that the 'Examiner' could hold a leading role is disseminating information globally as I live in Tasmania, and since I have spent the last 20 years here writing 9 books which are now 'free on line,' it might behove you to visit me alone or with others if you so wish, and you could bring your 'recorder' and a prepared list of any questions you may have because I am a very slow typist.

Caroline, maybe your Editor can print this whole letter as a 'centrefold' so that we begin to educate the whole community.

I do live in the NE at Pyengana but you are welcome to visit me at Clemencia's place as she lives at White Hills, and I do stopover there once a fortnight with my wife for a couple of days, so just make contact if you so wish.

The Examiner did a front page article of me as 'The Messiah' many years ago and soon the world will awaken to the FACT that I AM HE and no other will be 'coming in the clouds.' It is ONLY the CONTENT of the message I bring from God that stands 'above' the clouds on the internet highway that will 'save' anyone.

Sincerely - Terence

page 4 of 4

Clemencia's 'added' submission to magistrate Marron at the Court on 8th December 2015

Your honour,  I want to submit a few words to the court in writing as well as reading it aloud.

(I pass a copy to the court clerk - one for the magistrate and other for the prosecutor)

Your honour, the last time we met your advice to me was that I learn the meaning of the words: "STRICT LIABILITY" - I did ask Mr. Malaherre  my spiritual counsellor of its meaning and he advised me that it implied:

"Ignorance of THE LAW is no excuse" but added that:   - -

Since this case was one of conscience, faith, belief and religious ideology, that the 'law' being  applied to IT was the "Equal Return" aspect of God's immutable LAW which states as follows:

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" or  more simply understanding that: "What you do unto others (kindly or cruelly) will be done unto you at the time and in the place so ordained by the intelligent Creative or Destructive energy essence of God." In other words, whatever energy  was used by you or by your servants in interaction with others,  has a 'Karmic' comeback.

In consequence of the benign, positive and LOVING ideological POLICY commanded by God, I have in the past and to this day continue to do my best to maintain STRICT OBEDIENCE to God's command to man. In so doing I go my way 'lovingly, peacefully and caringly' as a mental health counsellor and I do forgive my oppressors. (In this case the ATO)  This I do because my first allegiance is to God and my conscience so dictates since I know I must never retaliate no matter what the provocation.

Furthermore your honour, my spiritual counsellor advised me that when referring to the words 'Strict Liability,' you were probably referring to my apparent ignorance of 'The State Law or rules,' Laws you administer, but Laws which were being used illegally in this subordinate court to persecute me for my absolute pacifist ideological beliefs. (My Religion)

Since this case is based upon my belief that it is a Constitutional matter, the State Laws were automatically 'voided,' hence my need to operate within the constraints of God's command: ('peace at all times and in all situations.')  Equally relevant to this case is the Constitution of your institution, a Constitution which clearly pertains to having the same proviso:

"Do not disturb the peace."

Terence has always advised me that 'constitutionally' within ITS 'superior to State' LAW, I was guaranteed immunity from persecution by the Sovereign constitutional powers, and that it was an illegal activity for any State Law or rules to be used as the basis for an attack on my proven religious ideology. This matter has always been seen by me to be a matter of the ‘Freedom of Religion’ Acts of THE Constitution. (s116 & 46-1)

I have always believed in God and also believed that it was error to fund anyone who was terrorising or causing harm to others. My counsel has advised me to hold fast to my 'peaceful ways' and to never give in to threat or coercion but to always  remain trusting in God which I will do to the end of my days.

That is my submission to the court today.

Clemencia Barnes, 8th December 2015


NOTE: This document becomes ITEM 51 on page 2 at: http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/ctang01.htm