The END of the taxation STORY

This is an educational document that will assist every community globally to comprehend 'something' once they have READ ALL ABOUT IT. Presently the 'Council' operations are NOT solely for the provision of services, but are for the purpose of control, interference and imposing punitive 'governance' upon any community member who 'defies' edicts that are forcefully imposed as RULES.

This 'paper' should be enough for the reader to assist in the upliftment of Council operations once the global insane chaos is over. Man will then truly bow to the Command of their Creator and 'love one another.' From then ON, the local community Council will ONLY have the purpose of assisting people with benign services in a proper manner.

~ Defence papers ~

Reference the legality or otherwise of the NMC claim for an annual rental Tax '(Rates) on a freehold property.





DEFENCE - ACTION No. M/2016/1607


Magistrates court Launceston

73 Charles Street, Launceston. Ph 6777 2945


CLAIMANT: Northern Midlands Council of 13 Smith Street Longford Tasmania 7301 - 63977303 (Maree Bricknell rates dept)


DEFENDANT: Clemencia Christina Barnes of 180 Everton lane, White Hills. Tas 7258



SUMMARY OF CLAIM : total amount claimed $ 937.26


Being the amount stated by the claimant due and owing by the defendant to the claimant for unpaid rates and charges pursuant to rates notice 205100.02 issued 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 for the property situated at 'Everton Springs.' Waddles road, Evandale (PID/s 7312189)

The defendant Clemencia Barnes is the holder of a 'Freehold Title' document issued by the State land titles records office and is proof that her property is owned solely by herself. I now refer to the:

Tasmania local government act 1993 states

Land Tax Act 2000

An Act to provide for taxation on land [Royal Assent 13 December 2000] - Be it enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Tasmania,

Commissioner means the Commissioner of State Revenue appointed under the Taxation Administration Act 1997;

(1) The Commissioner is to issue to each owner of land –

(a) an assessment of land tax payable in respect of that land; and
(b) a demand for the payment of the land tax.


4. Act binds Crown

This Act binds the Crown in right of Tasmania and, so far as the legislative power of Parliament permits, in all its other capacities.



86A. General principles in relation to making or varying rates

(1) A council, in adopting policies and making decisions concerning the making or varying of rates, must take into account the principles that –

(a) rates constitute taxation for the purposes of local government, rather than a fee for a service; and

page 2

I write this because a 'conundrum' has arisen or been exposed within what the Council terms the 'rates' demands upon the community by Councils. Council rates are a TAX as confirmed in the above (a) rates constitute taxation solely for the purpose of 'governing' rather than being a matter of fees for the provision of services to the community.

The High Court ruled that State Governments could not raise any tax. The Parliament of the States do not have the power of taxation because that is the domain of the Federal Government on matters of taxation.

In respect of the above Section 4 - Act binds Crown in right of Tasmania, it simply confirms that Tasmanian 'Acts' are subject to the Acts of the Sovereign 'Crown' Constitution.

Since the entwining of the taxation aspect and the provision of services had taken place in the minds of rate payers, it behoves everyone to now come to a decision as to the validity of any form of 'Land or Rates' taxation (Tax) because of the COMPLICITY FACTOR when the use of said monies 'conflict' with the conscience of the individual landowner/occupier.

Maybe it is the time for all mankind to see that one must naturally pay for the provision of benign services used but, - - - one must not be forced to pay any taxes towards being 'governed' if said 'governance' is a conflict of ideology.  For that is in conflict with the 'Freedom of Religion' Acts of the Constitution.

Neither must individuals be forced to 'cough up' monies when services are not required or nor given or unused by the individual and, - - - most definitely, the individual must be in a position whereby they do not become complicit to others being evicted or sold up if said TAX demands are not met by them.

The 'question' at hand is simply whether or not a land owner is by God required to conform to a DEMAND that they pay a tax to some 'other' person simply because said 'other' has been authorised to make said demand by a 'third' party namely, one having the Title of 'State Governor' who 'licensed' or enacted the authority for said demand to be made upon the public.

The question to first 'ask' is from 'whence' came the authority granting the 'Governor' or politicians the Right to invoke said taxation 'Act' in the first instance? This question needs an answer because by so doing, they have assumed 'ownership' of either the land 'mass' area in question or ownership of the named Title deeds owner of the land.

It follows that any taxation imposed by the use of 'force of arms' backup actually means that those managing the rules of the 'institution' assume that (in this case) C. Barnes is a 'slave citizen,' and that therefore her 'person' is the 'property' of the State rules or rulers which means that individuals have NO 'choices' of their own.

Since Clemencia B has appointed her spiritual advisor (myself) to be her 'aid' and support counsel, I can but do my best to bring to the attention to the 'Governor, the Politicians, the Taxation Commissioner, the NMC officials as well the local Court Magistrate and Police 'backup' that they need to avail themselves of the FACT that all State 'matters' are themselves 'governed' and controlled by a higher authority, being THE CONSTITUTION that legalises, limits or restricts State activities.

page 3

Presently, local council officials have assumed the Right to continue using the 'muddy' waters of the lower 'Petty Sessions' court to deal with matters of 'faith conscience and taxation.' This has resulted in anomalies arising from the multitudes of varying 'articles' or rules invoked by political decree. One being that council cannot 'raise' taxes but they are empowered by 'rules' to be tax 'collectors.'

Presently, citizens are only left in PEACE if they satisfy State rules not realising that all State 'Acts' are subject TO the Acts of the Constitution, and IT most certainly does not grant 'anyone' an 'Open Licence' to go forth and STEAL.

Further to that fact, there is an even higher authority, being that of the God-given CONSCIENCE of the individual who in this 'case' most certainly does not consider herself to be the 'slave' of any 'system,' Governor, Commissioner or other, and she therefore repudiates all or any 'claims' made against her 'property' as an ANNUAL 'TAX.'

Firstly, I will go back so as to try and show the 'institutional' officials of the ILLEGALITY of the raising UP of their own system of Government:

The 'sovereign' who seized control of the Australian lands in the first instance on 26 January 1788 were the people at the flag raising ceremony and the formal seizing of possession of the 'Australian' land in the name of King George III. That person was Governor 'Phillip' and a few dozen marines and officers from the vessel 'Supply.'

Absolute pacifists such as Clemencia do not recognise this 'armed and forceful take-over' of presumed 'terra-nullius' lands giving any 'Sovereign' or their heirs and successors legal possession with any further entitlements enabling them to legally 'extort' TAX monies from citizens of the land.

Secondly, absolute pacifists cannot be LEGALLY forced to go against their 'Will' or conscience and fund by taxes any person or institution having a contra ideological doctrine (religion) to theirs. The State doctrine being the use of force and armed forces men backup to control, subjugate, punish, wage war or extort taxes forcefully from others. Such activities are unconscionable to pacifists and are also in conflict with their religious belief in peace, love, mercy and compassion as commanded by God.

Why is it that pacifists cannot be legally forced to go against their conscience and religious ideology? Because they are guaranteed PROTECTION by the 'Freedom of religion' Acts of THE CONSTITUTION reference;

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (9th July 1900) section 116

"The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, - and

The Constitution Act 1934 (Tasmania) states:

This document includes a legal guarantee of the religious liberty and equality of Tasmanians. Every citizen is guaranteed freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion under Section 46(1) of this Act.

Part V - General provisions - Religious freedom

46. (1) Freedom of conscience and the free profession and practice of religion are, subject to public order and morality, guaranteed to every citizen.

(2) No person shall be subject to any disability, or be required to take any oath on account of his religion or religious belief.

page 4

In fact this is also the Civil Right granted unto man by the 'forefathers' who raised UP the Constitutions of many lands with the 'proviso' that man was FREE to live according to this peaceful ideology (religious belief) as long as they did not 'disturb the peace of the land nor cause harm to others.'

Note: What is or is not ones religion?

Ones religion is not any of the 'named' organisations such as Islam or Christianity or Buddhism, nor is it the named individuals such as Buddha, Muhammad or Jesus espousing the Policy purportedly ordained by the invisible God.

Ones religion is ones specific ideological code of conduct Policy. A doctrinal Policy followed with great devotion in relation to a ‘way or order’ of existence. Ones religion is espoused by ones 'faith or belief' in the requirements of a supernatural being (God) or other Force. An example of this is evidenced by whether individuals choose to 'follow or engage in' WAR or PEACE.

The Constitution LIMITS and RESTRICTS the powers of lower courts whose activities are 'supposed' to always be subject to the constitutional authority. Note:

Legislative powers of the Parliament [see Notes 10 and 11]

The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:

(xxiv)  the service and execution throughout the Commonwealth of the civil and criminal process and the judgments of the courts of the States;
(xxv)  the recognition throughout the Commonwealth of the laws, the public Acts and records, and the judicial proceedings of the States;

PLEASE NOTE - Section 51 above states: All State rules/decrees/dictates ARE subject TO the Constitutions of Australia  and Tasmania given above. Any State Constitutional Act applies equally to all States or territories.


Notice to Attorneys-General

 (1)  Where a cause pending in a federal court including the High Court or in a court of a State or Territory involves a matter arising under the Constitution or involving its interpretation, it is the duty of the court not to proceed in the cause unless and until the court is satisfied that notice of the cause, specifying the nature of the matter has been given to the Attorneys-General of the Commonwealth and of the States, and a reasonable time has elapsed since the giving of the notice for consideration by the Attorneys-General, of the question of intervention in the proceedings or removal of the cause to the High Court.

Prosecutors in ignoring the Constitution, by placing their 'case' before petty court magistrates instead of the High Court are GUILTY of criminal activity, and also guilty of enticing equally arrogant or ignorant Magistrates to 'follow their lead' as they ILLEGALLY persecute the peaceful.

Regrettably, the serving police officers are also dragged into this criminal activity as they are then 'forced' to wage war against the peaceful whom they are paid a wage to PROTECT. All involved will find out that ignorance is NO excuse as they are forced by circumstances beyond their powers or guns to control and great travail is to be their fate.

page 5


88. Rates collected on behalf of authorities
(1) A statutory authority which has power to make rates based on the valuation list under the Valuation of Land Act 2001 may enter into an agreement with a council for the council to collect the rates on its behalf.
(2) An agreement may contain a provision that the statutory authority is to pay the council a commission for the collection of the rates.
(3) If a council agrees to collect rates on behalf of a statutory authority, the council may –

(a) incorporate the rates with its own rates; and
(b) recover the rates under Division 10 as if they were a debt due to the council.

I only refer to the above because;

A - there is no mention that 'Council' can 'tax' anyone but that it has been 'appointed' to be a 'collection agency' for rates taxes.

B - The community members need to ask themselves: "Is our local Council required by us to be a 'tax collector' for and on behalf of some invisible 'overlord' so that he/she can 'govern' us with an unholy 'Sword' or, would we the community rather that our 'Council' become a kindly benign provider of community services similar to that of the 'butcher, baker and candlestick maker"?

C - One needs to ask oneself: "How or why do the staff of this community based organisation come to the 'conclusion' that a politically invoked 'tax' and a politically invoked 'collection agency' have the RIGHT to use 'force of arms' or threats of punishment (coercion) and 'eviction' as the means to extract money from community members"?

Why does the 'Mayor' and other supposed 'wise' community elders PERMIT their fellow citizens to be 'dragged to court' to be punished if they are unable to meet the taxing demands of overlords for ANY reason?

I need to make it perfectly clear here and now that political 'rules' raised UP by mortal man are NOT 'the law' because they are simply the demands or decrees of DICTATORS. Being people who under the 'guise' of 'Its for your own good' and 'Its our law' simply IMPOSE their  controls, demands and punitive activities upon everyone. Where is the freedom to 'Just be at peace and live without some 'rascal' demanding your MONEY'?

I am here on earth to 'remind' mankind that there is ONLY ONE LAW. It is the immutable Law of equal return of God's energy:

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" - If you impose strictures, punishment and suffering using rules backed by force of arms, then others will do the same unto you.

page 6

Since it has been exposed on page (3) above that the 'governance' RITUAL aspect on a beach in 1788 was and yet is an ILLEGAL activity, there is also NO legal 'statutory' authority (Ref Act 88 above) and it is now the time for everyone to turn to God and OBEY Him and His decree on 'bended knee.'

Why do I say this? Because for any 'council' employee to use illegally invoked rules as the means or justification to DEFY GOD and His Command and to thus force a community member to part with their money, is an ACTIVITY having VERY SEVERE 'penalty' consequences within the immutable Law of God.

All persons of 'official' status live in the delusional fantasy that since they cannot 'see' the face of God as can I, that they can interfere in the lives of others with impunity and immunity and that is why I do what I do, in the 'hope' that a few of these deluded souls will be saved by my 'grace.'

Either way, why would you as a member of any community uphold or support or pay ANY monies to a punitive and controlling community 'effort' if you knew that these 'servants of the people' were going forth in your name and on your behalf causing mental and emotional trauma and HARM to your neighbours in contravention of God's 'pen' and true Command?

As far as I the returned Spirit of Truth am 'concerned,' any person funding a governing 'body' and permitting ITS staff to engage in punitive measures that CONFLICT with God's: "Do not disturb the peace of the land" Command are foolish indeed.

It is now the time for all or any 'governing' Council to be abolished, and the 'Council' must become solely a 'benign services provider' similar to other community service providers such as the 'butcher, the baker, the candle-stick maker' and, - - - the above service providers do NOT have the authority to impose their services nor demand funds from anyone and neither are community members required to pay for any services they do not receive or need or use.

Let sanity now prevail because there is NO 'earthly' Sovereign doing anything to protect THE PEACEFUL. All earthly 'sovereigns' today are EXTORTIONISTS enslaving THE PEOPLE to satisfy their own 'ego's, pride, vanity and liquid arrogance. God is GOD, not man.

Since this 'case' is one of 'conscience' and religious ideological BELIEF or 'faith,' it is a matter that can ONLY be legally 'heard or tried' in the High Court of the land and it follows that:

1 - In presenting the case to the lowly 'Court of petty sessions' at Launceston, NMC Staff member (Maree Bricknell) is doing her best to 'sideline' the High Court and this of itself is a seditious criminal activity and TREASON.

2 - In presenting the case before Magistrate 'Brown' on 17th October 2016 when it was due to go before a 'conciliator,' she advised the Magistrate that she had decided to NOT so do and it was plain for all to see that on the next 'hearing' date set for 9th December, that she had 'enticed' the Magistrate to 'hear' the case ILLEGALLY because for some years now she and her CEO had been made aware of the Constitutional aspects.

Since the Tasmanian Courts of petty sessions magistrates are proven to be illegally (criminally) handling constitutional matters and 'convicting' defendants, we will now await and see exactly 'what' is to be on the 9th December.

Why do I so say? Because I have been advised that the NMC solicitors will be making a submission on their behalf prior to 17th November and sending me and Clemencia B a copy so that we can make a submission also, and I simply await to see whether or not the supposed 'legal' team of NMC experts will give the Constitutional authority any 'credence' or not.

page 7

If for ANY reason the NMC and their solicitors choose to ignore the Constitutional Authority and place the case before the Launceston magistrates court, then it is surely proof that it is an absolute disregard to the Constitution of their institution (page 3 above) and thus:

1 - There is NO 'honesty,' sanity or legal validity in this land and everyone is a 'common' criminal.
2 - The NMC 'claimant' is seeking to contravene the Constitutional Act
(9th July 1900) section 116 and < prohibit the free exercise of any religion >
3 - The NMC 'claimant' is seeking to contravene the Constitutional
Act 1934 (Tasmania) and defy the < legal guarantee of the religious liberty >

4 - The NMC 'claimant' is seeking to contravene the Constitutional Act 1934 (Tasmania) and deny the < guaranteed freedom of conscience >
5 - The NMC 'claimant' is seeking to contravene the
Part V - General provisions and deny the < guarantee to every citizen >
6 - The NMC 'claimant' is seeking to contravene the
Part V - General provisions) and deny the < No person shall be subject to any disability >

It will be sad indeed for the Tasmania Police PEACE force if they are 'chosen' to enforce any court of petty sessions judgements because not only will they be in breach of the Constitutional Authority but they will also then be known 'globally' to be 'Mafiosi' style gangsters who have no qualms about taking a false wage from THE PEOPLE.

primarily what needs to be understood is that there is only ONE reason why any person or 'group' believe they have a RIGHT to impose a 'tax' upon others and that is solely due to their vanity or arrogance in the pursuit of finding 'legal or illegal' ways to use 'force of arms' backup (Weapons) wielded by merciless MERCENARY forces who are paid a wage to "follow orders." Why I ask do people do their 'best' to search out 'rules' in text books that enable the CRUCIFIXION of others?

I have lived long enough to know that people using the DARK 'Power of God' are totally RUTHLESS and of NO conscience because that is the 'Policy' of said Dark ENERGY. It justifies the user into using 'rules' backed by force of arms to control other children of God living outside of God's pure Light.

Courts are places where all persons imposing strictures or fines or other punishment are ALL engaged in DARK activity. Activity that is in direct defiance of God's Command with its 'Forgive' Policy.

As you the 'reader' can or would see if you 'checked' the books of rules, you would find literally THOUSANDS of 'Acts' invoked without your knowledge or 'input,' and many 'elevated' long before your 'birth' here on earth. These decrees are what PERMIT the vain and arrogant rulers to control and punish with seeming IMPUNITY, and that is ERROR.

Everyone in 'power' is so 'busy' in their 'self-righteous' ACTIVITY as they search out and follow rules that support their 'cause,' that they no longer see the REALITY being, that they are defiant of their CREATOR, and with them, He is VERY ANGRY.

IF you THE INDIVIDUAL follow God as you BOW in OBEDIENCE to His Command, then you can ignore each and every 'rule' invoked or raised up by your forebears as well as those dictated by political forces in this life time.

All the controlling rules and punitive 'attachments' are the inspiration of the DARK aspect of God's ENERGY and invoked by HIM to subjugate all whom 'live' in a manner that is in contravention of His dictated "Go your way in peace and love one another" POLICY.

page 8

Let my 'pen' advise all of you; neither the village chief, magistrate, town 'clerk,' military 'muscle' or any other is GOD. All of these people who are in the 'business' of interference, control and punishment are soon to be faced by the DARK aspect of God's ENERGY and they will get to know pure liquid TERROR as IT the DARK balances ITS 'Scales of justice.'

"Please now be NICE to those who are NOT 'disturbing the peace' and to those who are, - - - BE merciful and compassionate."

So says our God via this His 'pen.'

There is nothing 'worse' than people who make or 'live' by the rules invoked to control and punish others who themselves do not 'stick' to using the 'correct' set of rules when they set out to vindictively 'crucify' others or to steal their money.

Clemencia is proven to be a peaceful person because she does not 'vote' for man as head of house and neither does she fund a punitive system because she decided long ago to have her God as her head of house and she does her best to obey His Command to go her way in peace and be merciful, compassionate and forgiving and she cannot fund any contra controlling or punitive doctrine when it causes pain or suffering to others.

She is therefore by God entitled to be protected by the constitutional authority and IF said 'authority' decides to fail in its 'duty' to uphold said Constitution, then these persons and those making use of said 'failure' are all taking a false wage. These individuals she leaves in God's hands since she knows that He is the ultimate Judge.

In this 'case,' any 'result' other than the Magistrate saying: "You are free to go Madam" will be clear 'proof' that the Magistrate is in 'cahoots' with the NMC and his 'fate' to then be as seen by me will also one-day be seen by him. (Hell with all his 'cohorts')

Footnote - 1: It is an illegal activity for any person or institutional official to try and stop a peaceful person from living according to their religious ideological belief.

It is the Sovereign and Civil RIGHT for an individual to REFUSE to "Pay up a demand" if their conscience so dictates, and it is also their God-given right to OBEY God and NOT fund the control over or, interference in the life of or, the punishment of or, the causing of harm to others through paying taxes.

Footnote - 2 : Since I AM the Teacher of Spiritual Truth I add: If the Magistrate ignores the 'Freedom of Religion' clause of the Constitution and invokes a punitive ruling it simply means:

1 - His mind is controlled by the Dark aspect of the Source that is using him and NMC staff to cause harm to Clemencia and, why is the DARK so doing?

2 - Because Clemencia Barnes must have done the same (caused harm) to some other person in her past (or done by her servants) and that has nothing to do with this 'case' but the DARK uses 'any' means to balance ITS 'Scales of Justice.'

3 - Now you see the 'deadly' danger for anyone defying their God. They JUSTIFY the use of 'force' to cause harm and as they do, they not only accrue a similar 'due' within the 'Law of energy,' but they also draw IN more Dark, (sin) and this is what drags their own soul down and away from THE LIGHT.  

Men backed by GUNS and DARK 'justification' simply "Do whatever they wish to" to you or me - - - BUT - - - they see NOT the FUTURE consequence for themselves within the IMMUTABLE Law of THE SOVEREIGN, our LORD GOD.

Never make ANY demands upon anyone - Terence