~ Defence papers ~Reference the legality or otherwise of the NMC claim for an annual rental Tax '(Rates) on a freehold property.
The defendant Clemencia Barnes is the holder of a 'Freehold Title' document issued by the State land titles records office and is proof that her property is owned solely by herself. I now refer to the:
Tasmania local government act 1993 states
I write this because a 'conundrum' has arisen or been exposed within what the Council terms the 'rates' demands upon the community by Councils. Council rates are a TAX as confirmed in the above (a) rates constitute taxation solely for the purpose of 'governing' rather than being a matter of fees for the provision of services to the community.
The High Court ruled that State Governments could not raise any tax. The Parliament of the States do not have the power of taxation because that is the domain of the Federal Government on matters of taxation.
In respect of the above Section 4 - Act binds Crown in right of Tasmania, it simply confirms that Tasmanian 'Acts' are subject to the Acts of the Sovereign 'Crown' Constitution.
Since the entwining of the taxation aspect and the provision of services had taken place in the minds of rate payers, it behoves everyone to now come to a decision as to the validity of any form of 'Land or Rates' taxation (Tax) because of the COMPLICITY FACTOR when the use of said monies 'conflict' with the conscience of the individual landowner/occupier.
Maybe it is the time for all mankind to see that one must naturally pay for the provision of benign services used but, - - - one must not be forced to pay any taxes towards being 'governed' if said 'governance' is a conflict of ideology. For that is in conflict with the 'Freedom of Religion' Acts of the Constitution.
Neither must individuals be forced to 'cough up' monies when services are not required or nor given or unused by the individual and, - - - most definitely, the individual must be in a position whereby they do not become complicit to others being evicted or sold up if said TAX demands are not met by them.
The 'question' at hand is simply whether or not a land owner is by God required to conform to a DEMAND that they pay a tax to some 'other' person simply because said 'other' has been authorised to make said demand by a 'third' party namely, one having the Title of 'State Governor' who 'licensed' or enacted the authority for said demand to be made upon the public.
The question to first 'ask' is from 'whence' came the authority granting the 'Governor' or politicians the Right to invoke said taxation 'Act' in the first instance? This question needs an answer because by so doing, they have assumed 'ownership' of either the land 'mass' area in question or ownership of the named Title deeds owner of the land.
It follows that any taxation imposed by the use of 'force of arms' backup actually means that those managing the rules of the 'institution' assume that (in this case) C. Barnes is a 'slave citizen,' and that therefore her 'person' is the 'property' of the State rules or rulers which means that individuals have NO 'choices' of their own.
Since Clemencia B has appointed her spiritual advisor (myself) to be her 'aid' and support counsel, I can but do my best to bring to the attention to the 'Governor, the Politicians, the Taxation Commissioner, the NMC officials as well the local Court Magistrate and Police 'backup' that they need to avail themselves of the FACT that all State 'matters' are themselves 'governed' and controlled by a higher authority, being THE CONSTITUTION that legalises, limits or restricts State activities.
Presently, local council officials have assumed the Right to continue using the 'muddy' waters of the lower 'Petty Sessions' court to deal with matters of 'faith conscience and taxation.' This has resulted in anomalies arising from the multitudes of varying 'articles' or rules invoked by political decree. One being that council cannot 'raise' taxes but they are empowered by 'rules' to be tax 'collectors.'
Presently, citizens are only left in PEACE if they satisfy State rules not realising that all State 'Acts' are subject TO the Acts of the Constitution, and IT most certainly does not grant 'anyone' an 'Open Licence' to go forth and STEAL.
Further to that fact, there is an even higher authority, being that of the God-given CONSCIENCE of the individual who in this 'case' most certainly does not consider herself to be the 'slave' of any 'system,' Governor, Commissioner or other, and she therefore repudiates all or any 'claims' made against her 'property' as an ANNUAL 'TAX.'
Firstly, I will go back so as to try and show the 'institutional' officials of the ILLEGALITY of the raising UP of their own system of Government:
The 'sovereign' who seized control of the Australian lands in the first instance on 26 January 1788 were the people at the flag raising ceremony and the formal seizing of possession of the 'Australian' land in the name of King George III. That person was Governor 'Phillip' and a few dozen marines and officers from the vessel 'Supply.'
Absolute pacifists such as Clemencia do not recognise this 'armed and forceful take-over' of presumed 'terra-nullius' lands giving any 'Sovereign' or their heirs and successors legal possession with any further entitlements enabling them to legally 'extort' TAX monies from citizens of the land.
Secondly, absolute pacifists cannot be LEGALLY forced to go against their 'Will' or conscience and fund by taxes any person or institution having a contra ideological doctrine (religion) to theirs. The State doctrine being the use of force and armed forces men backup to control, subjugate, punish, wage war or extort taxes forcefully from others. Such activities are unconscionable to pacifists and are also in conflict with their religious belief in peace, love, mercy and compassion as commanded by God.
Why is it that pacifists cannot be legally forced to go against their conscience and religious ideology? Because they are guaranteed PROTECTION by the 'Freedom of religion' Acts of THE CONSTITUTION reference;
In fact this is also the Civil Right granted unto man by the 'forefathers' who raised UP the Constitutions of many lands with the 'proviso' that man was FREE to live according to this peaceful ideology (religious belief) as long as they did not 'disturb the peace of the land nor cause harm to others.'
Note: What is or is not ones religion?
The Constitution LIMITS and RESTRICTS the powers of lower courts whose activities are 'supposed' to always be subject to the constitutional authority. Note:
Prosecutors in ignoring the Constitution, by placing their 'case' before petty court magistrates instead of the High Court are GUILTY of criminal activity, and also guilty of enticing equally arrogant or ignorant Magistrates to 'follow their lead' as they ILLEGALLY persecute the peaceful.
Regrettably, the serving police officers are also dragged into this criminal activity as they are then 'forced' to wage war against the peaceful whom they are paid a wage to PROTECT. All involved will find out that ignorance is NO excuse as they are forced by circumstances beyond their powers or guns to control and great travail is to be their fate.
I only refer to the above because;
I need to make it perfectly clear here and now that political 'rules' raised UP by mortal man are NOT 'the law' because they are simply the demands or decrees of DICTATORS. Being people who under the 'guise' of 'Its for your own good' and 'Its our law' simply IMPOSE their controls, demands and punitive activities upon everyone. Where is the freedom to 'Just be at peace and live without some 'rascal' demanding your MONEY'?
I am here on earth to 'remind' mankind that there is ONLY ONE LAW. It is the immutable Law of equal return of God's energy:
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" - If you impose strictures, punishment and suffering using rules backed by force of arms, then others will do the same unto you.
Since it has been exposed on page (3) above that the 'governance' RITUAL aspect on a beach in 1788 was and yet is an ILLEGAL activity, there is also NO legal 'statutory' authority (Ref Act 88 above) and it is now the time for everyone to turn to God and OBEY Him and His decree on 'bended knee.'
Why do I say this? Because for any 'council' employee to use illegally invoked rules as the means or justification to DEFY GOD and His Command and to thus force a community member to part with their money, is an ACTIVITY having VERY SEVERE 'penalty' consequences within the immutable Law of God.
All persons of 'official' status live in the delusional fantasy that since they cannot 'see' the face of God as can I, that they can interfere in the lives of others with impunity and immunity and that is why I do what I do, in the 'hope' that a few of these deluded souls will be saved by my 'grace.'
Either way, why would you as a member of any community uphold or support or pay ANY monies to a punitive and controlling community 'effort' if you knew that these 'servants of the people' were going forth in your name and on your behalf causing mental and emotional trauma and HARM to your neighbours in contravention of God's 'pen' and true Command?
As far as I the returned Spirit of Truth am 'concerned,' any person funding a governing 'body' and permitting ITS staff to engage in punitive measures that CONFLICT with God's: "Do not disturb the peace of the land" Command are foolish indeed.
It is now the time for all or any 'governing' Council to be abolished, and the 'Council' must become solely a 'benign services provider' similar to other community service providers such as the 'butcher, the baker, the candle-stick maker' and, - - - the above service providers do NOT have the authority to impose their services nor demand funds from anyone and neither are community members required to pay for any services they do not receive or need or use.
Let sanity now prevail because there is NO 'earthly' Sovereign doing anything to protect THE PEACEFUL. All earthly 'sovereigns' today are EXTORTIONISTS enslaving THE PEOPLE to satisfy their own 'ego's, pride, vanity and liquid arrogance. God is GOD, not man.
Since this 'case' is one of 'conscience' and religious ideological BELIEF or 'faith,' it is a matter that can ONLY be legally 'heard or tried' in the High Court of the land and it follows that:
1 - In presenting the case to the lowly 'Court of petty sessions' at Launceston, NMC Staff member (Maree Bricknell) is doing her best to 'sideline' the High Court and this of itself is a seditious criminal activity and TREASON.
2 - In presenting the case before Magistrate 'Brown' on 17th October 2016 when it was due to go before a 'conciliator,' she advised the Magistrate that she had decided to NOT so do and it was plain for all to see that on the next 'hearing' date set for 9th December, that she had 'enticed' the Magistrate to 'hear' the case ILLEGALLY because for some years now she and her CEO had been made aware of the Constitutional aspects.
Since the Tasmanian Courts of petty sessions magistrates are proven to be illegally (criminally) handling constitutional matters and 'convicting' defendants, we will now await and see exactly 'what' is to be on the 9th December.
Why do I so say? Because I have been advised that the NMC solicitors will be making a submission on their behalf prior to 17th November and sending me and Clemencia B a copy so that we can make a submission also, and I simply await to see whether or not the supposed 'legal' team of NMC experts will give the Constitutional authority any 'credence' or not.
If for ANY reason the NMC and their solicitors choose to ignore the Constitutional Authority and place the case before the Launceston magistrates court, then it is surely proof that it is an absolute disregard to the Constitution of their institution (page 3 above) and thus:
It will be sad indeed for the Tasmania Police PEACE force if they are 'chosen' to enforce any court of petty sessions judgements because not only will they be in breach of the Constitutional Authority but they will also then be known 'globally' to be 'Mafiosi' style gangsters who have no qualms about taking a false wage from THE PEOPLE.
primarily what needs to be understood is that there is only ONE reason why any person or 'group' believe they have a RIGHT to impose a 'tax' upon others and that is solely due to their vanity or arrogance in the pursuit of finding 'legal or illegal' ways to use 'force of arms' backup (Weapons) wielded by merciless MERCENARY forces who are paid a wage to "follow orders." Why I ask do people do their 'best' to search out 'rules' in text books that enable the CRUCIFIXION of others?
I have lived long enough to know that people using the DARK 'Power of God' are totally RUTHLESS and of NO conscience because that is the 'Policy' of said Dark ENERGY. It justifies the user into using 'rules' backed by force of arms to control other children of God living outside of God's pure Light.
Courts are places where all persons imposing strictures or fines or other punishment are ALL engaged in DARK activity. Activity that is in direct defiance of God's Command with its 'Forgive' Policy.
As you the 'reader' can or would see if you 'checked' the books of rules, you would find literally THOUSANDS of 'Acts' invoked without your knowledge or 'input,' and many 'elevated' long before your 'birth' here on earth. These decrees are what PERMIT the vain and arrogant rulers to control and punish with seeming IMPUNITY, and that is ERROR.
Everyone in 'power' is so 'busy' in their 'self-righteous' ACTIVITY as they search out and follow rules that support their 'cause,' that they no longer see the REALITY being, that they are defiant of their CREATOR, and with them, He is VERY ANGRY.
Let my 'pen' advise all of you; neither the village chief, magistrate, town 'clerk,' military 'muscle' or any other is GOD. All of these people who are in the 'business' of interference, control and punishment are soon to be faced by the DARK aspect of God's ENERGY and they will get to know pure liquid TERROR as IT the DARK balances ITS 'Scales of justice.'
There is nothing 'worse' than people who make or 'live' by the rules invoked to control and punish others who themselves do not 'stick' to using the 'correct' set of rules when they set out to vindictively 'crucify' others or to steal their money.
Clemencia is proven to be a peaceful person because she does not 'vote' for man as head of house and neither does she fund a punitive system because she decided long ago to have her God as her head of house and she does her best to obey His Command to go her way in peace and be merciful, compassionate and forgiving and she cannot fund any contra controlling or punitive doctrine when it causes pain or suffering to others.
She is therefore by God entitled to be protected by the constitutional authority and IF said 'authority' decides to fail in its 'duty' to uphold said Constitution, then these persons and those making use of said 'failure' are all taking a false wage. These individuals she leaves in God's hands since she knows that He is the ultimate Judge.
In this 'case,' any 'result' other than the Magistrate saying: "You are free to go Madam" will be clear 'proof' that the Magistrate is in 'cahoots' with the NMC and his 'fate' to then be as seen by me will also one-day be seen by him. (Hell with all his 'cohorts')
Footnote - 1: It is an illegal activity for any person or institutional official to try and stop a peaceful person from living according to their religious ideological belief.It is the Sovereign and Civil RIGHT for an individual to REFUSE to "Pay up a demand" if their conscience so dictates, and it is also their God-given right to OBEY God and NOT fund the control over or, interference in the life of or, the punishment of or, the causing of harm to others through paying taxes.
Footnote - 2 :
Since I AM the Teacher of Spiritual Truth
I add: If the Magistrate ignores the 'Freedom of Religion' clause of
the Constitution and invokes a punitive ruling it simply means:
Men backed by GUNS and DARK 'justification' simply "Do whatever they wish to" to you or me - - - BUT - - - they see NOT the FUTURE consequence for themselves within the IMMUTABLE Law of THE SOVEREIGN, our LORD GOD.
Never make ANY demands upon anyone - Terence