Open letter to Commander Bretton Smith of the Tasmania Police service, Launceston

~ The three 'tiers' of LAW or 'power and authority' backed by FORCE of arms ~
Incorporating the legality or illegality to cause HARM to others.

Dear Cdr. 'Bretton,' I thank you for your response dated 28th July and note your words which I assume refer to the possible arrest of Clemencia if so ordered by the presiding magistrate of the day (11th August 2015) being your response to my prior 'ask' that you simply do NOT arrest Clemencia if ordered to. You stated:

"I advise that an order issued by a court to police cannot be ignored and will be acted upon according to the law."

I am a teacher of truth and I respond hoping that you will see truth in that which I write for there is indeed an 'awful' lot at stake for serving police officers if: - - -

A - They continue along their present 'track' in ignorance of what they are factually doing to others in the 'name of the law.'
B - They fail to see that since police are 'armed men,' and thus can do 'whatever they wish to,' they need to consider exactly 'what' they intend to do to another member of society, especially if the 'order' is in conflict with the CIVIL RIGHTS of their 'victim' particularly when, as in this case, it is in conflict with existing SUPERIOR LAWS.
C - They fail to act appropriately and arrest the magistrate who is ordering the Police to disturb the peace of a peaceful person, due to the magistrate using inferior rules/laws which suggest that said magistrate is deliberately exceeding his official mandate in 'hearing' and judging a Constitutional matter.

Furthermore, if you are able to see that this 'order' to arrest would be in contravention of THE LAW regarding the civil rights of the individual because IT IS a CIVIL RIGHT to live peacefully and not be 'disturbed,' nor to be hauled in to 'give cause' as to 'why' one should not be punished when one has not disturbed the peace.

What you need to do to maintain your position of TRUST and to remain honourable to your wage and THE PEOPLE depending upon YOU to uphold the peace, is for you to arrest the ONE giving out the illegal orders which are a criminal activity. Arrest the magistrate and the prosecutor for ordering an illegal 'trial' and an ILLEGAL arrest.

Why do I say this? Because of your words: "will be acted upon according to the law" - You actually can 'act upon it' one way OR the other. It also seems as if this STATE 'law' or legality FACTOR is believed by everyone as being the ONE and ONLY 'set of laws' existing. This is an error of 'practise' of that which is the Truth, hence this epistle to you.

In one 'sense' THE LAW means that if one contravenes the 'edicts' or the 'rules or laws' used by magistrates or, if the orders to arrest are given to Police by magistrates as their 'authority, that there is some invisible VALIDITY or legality or immunity to the ones (yourself) carrying out the order.

The immunity being that your men can 'legally' then go forth and disturb the peace of a peaceful citizen, detain them, transport them, and hold them 'hostage' until such time as the magistrate deals with them punitively. You BELIEVE that you are 'within the law' even though your men are breaking the 'law' through - disturbing the peace of a peaceful citizen, detaining them, transporting them, and holding them 'hostage.'

It is the 'time' for Police to NOT simply assume that an 'order from above' is legal, valid or applicable to the circumstance to them simply because it has become 'normal' or an 'accepted' practice. 

page 2

The person in this 'case' has NEVER disturbed the peace and yet you are prepared to 'terrorise' her thereby causing mental and emotional trauma and other loss or suffering simply because a man, a magistrate, BELIEVES in his RIGHT to DEFY the REAL LAW OF THE LAND.

I am taking the time to write this to you and openly to the public because of the iniquity which has been ongoing openly for many long years, and I simply wish to PROTECT the Police service officers so that they do not suffer the consequences of FALSE ARREST and TREASONABLE activity.

Firstly - IN your reference to 'the law' I need to show YOU that there are THREE sets of LAWS of the land in use today. These THREE tiers of laws are pretty 'basic' to me because I am aware of their existence as I have been studying them for longer than you have lived on earth. TWO of these 'sets' of Laws are those invoked by mankind, and ONE is that LAW which simply exists invisibly due to being of a spiritual nature.

Since I am not aware of whether or not you believe in the spiritual law of THE SOURCE, (God) I will deal with the first two of which you really should be aware of more particularly since you receive your MANDATE to operate from said LAW. This said Law being the instructional POLICY authorising your activity and in fact LIMITING it to certain activities. (The superior Constitutional doctrine set (2) page 3)

This also applies to magistrates as well as judicial staff, court clerks, corrective services and all officers of State. However, I am very much aware that NONE of these persons presently consider whether or not their actions are 'within the law' or 'above the law' of even 'which set of laws' (1 or 2 of 3) they are entitled to use in their interaction with others which I speak on today..

This particularly pertinent in reference to the RIGHT of interference and PUNISHMENT and hence my desire to AWAKEN everyone to the seriousness of their actions and the devastating consequences to now unfold globally as foretold by my pen, because everyone is walking blindly the wrong way.

You presently are UNABLE to 'consider' or see that the arrest of a peaceful person who has not disturbed the peace as being an illegal activity on your part because you BELIEVE that magistrates must know what they are doing and that this somehow exonerates YOU.

Local magistrates are IGNORING their limited and illegally 'taken' mandate because they 'simply' hear and judge any case placed on their 'plate' by clerks of court who also choose to keep themselves IGNORANT of the facts even when advised of it by me. In this case by erroneously maintaining their right to hear and judge a constitutional matter in the lower Magistrates Court.

You are prepared to send forth your men trusting that they are 'safe' within THE LAW. They are ordered to do all the things forbidden to be done by any civil member of the community whilst they (you) do not even recognize that you have caused harm or trauma or more because you believe that since your actions are supposedly 'legal,' that you are above THE LAW or 'beyond' ITS reach. This is not true but, worse still, you believe that in order to accomplish the 'order' that you are entitled to go forth and cause 'terror and harm or loss or deprivation or dispossession of property.' (Woe indeed)

Brother, the POLICE role is to UPHOLD THE PEACE, it is NOT to 'disturb the peace of the peaceful' simply because some other 'mortal' in a position of POWER tells you to. His position of 'power' simply exists in being upheld by YOUR 'force of arms.'

page 3

I refer now to set (1) THE basic STATE 'laws' of the INSTITUTION.

It is the governing institution naming itself 'the government' by decree of mortal MAN bearing weapons to defend their perceived RIGHT to RULE other mortals - These are the 'thousands' of State 'rules, acts or decrees' named 'the laws' which are invoked endlessly annually by politicians, as they try their best to 'cover all bases' in reference to controlling everything from extorting money, meting out punishment, and interfering in every aspect of living as they 'kill off' any internal opposition through forceful punitive suppression. (The Police Army)

These laws are LIMITED in that they cannot LEGALLY 'compete with' or 'conflict with' or 'overrule' the LAW of the CONSTITUTION. If there is any 'difference of opinion' the Constitutional AUTHORITY REIGNS SUPREME above State laws. IT the Constitution is the sacred WORD of THE  earthly Sovereign Power and supreme ruler of Tasmania and Australia (Queen Elizabeth) as given below in (2).

I refer now to set (2) the LAW of the CONSTITUTION.

It is the VALID Law standing ABOVE any State rules, decrees or 'laws.'

Note: 1 -  valid law - The implication being that State law is valid unless it is overruled by THE Constitutional Law such as the ‘Freedom of Religion’ Act. This is an Act that is only 'valid' to those who have not disturbed the peace of the land and have their God as head of house rather than mortal man. They do not 'vote' for any politician and they do not seek the armed forces protection of man. (Caesar) They simply rely on God to protect them.

In the Annotated Constitution of Australia, Section 330 titled "Its Interpretation," John Quick and Robert Randolph Garran say:

"In the exercise of the duty of interpretation and adjudication not only in the High Court, but every court of competent jurisdiction has the right to declare that: A law of the Commonwealth or of a State is void by reason of transgressing the Constitution.

This is a duty cast upon the courts by the very nature of the judicial function. The federal Parliament and the State Parliaments are not sovereign bodies; they are legislatures with limited powers; - - - ."

In this case it follows that any STATE law which is being used in a Constitutional 'Freedom of religion' matter is a 'law' in  excess of those powers and is no law at all, it is simply a nullity, entitled to no obedience especially when a magistrate is trying to overthrow the 'validity' of the Sovereign Constitution.

What role do the courts play in Australian governance? Australia's system of courts is the third arm of Australian governance and is known as the Judiciary.

The role of the Judiciary is to:

  • apply the law as made by the Parliament
  • where necessary, interpret the laws made by Parliament and
  • Ensure that laws used comply with the Australian Constitution.

page 4

I refer now to set (3) the LAW of Return of God's energy used by man. 'God's Law.'

Since my task for God is to correct the error of way of man, it is incumbent upon me to REMIND everyone wielding God's FORCEFUL POWER that IT, as all of God's energy is a LAW UNTO ITSELF. Thus its RETURN unto user action cannot be controlled by man at all, and IT, being either the LIGHT benign loving creative energy of God or, the DARK malignant hateful destructive energy of God it simply 'offers' itself to man for man to use if man so wishes. God forbids man to use the destructive forceful aspect because God knows THE RESULT as do I.

This LAW of ENERGY RETURN is THE REAL INVISIBLE SOVEREIGN LAW because it has but ONE 'rule' being that:

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction - good for good, cruelty for cruelty.
mercy to the merciful, merciless to the merciless -
joy for joy given - suffering for suffering imposed.
What you or your servants do unto others will be done unto you.

Man (you) need to comprehend that the energy of THE SOURCE is within you and is what sustains your eternal existence as IT is indestructible and is what gives you LIFE to live, move, and have your being.

What mankind needs to now comprehend is that every 'decree' or rule or law of MAN is 'subject to' the spiritual law of return above. Thus my need to alert the Police to RETURN to their original role of ONLY upholding the peace rather than helping extortionists to coerce, terrorise, cause harm or loss etc.

Why? Because within the SPIRITUAL Law of Return there is NO 'recognition' by the ENERGY of any badge of office or mandate or official position, and thus there is NO 'voiding, avoiding or nullifying' the RETURN unto user of either the LIGHT benign kind or malignant cruel DARK energy used in ones interaction with others. This THE Law is THE ULTIMATE Sovereign LAW of Absolute Justice.

If the Police now ONLY haul IN persons who are carrying out immoral activities or causing harm for the SOLE PURPOSE of having said offenders EDUCATED, then the officers are SAFE (Within the Sovereign law) and receive a beneficent return ahead, given back (returned) by the benign energy they used to uplift the ways of offenders.

If however police officers are being used to terrorise those as Clemencia, and arrest, transport, detain or punish her, then they will by circumstances beyond their control be forced to suffer the same INJURY as God's Sovereign punitive 'eye for an eye' Law swings into action in the manner NOW revealed by MY pen in MY on-line Testament of Truth to humanity.

page 5

I am simply trying to reach you so that you do not breach any rules of engagement and thus ahead have to suffer the consequences. I need to advise you that Police officers do NOT have to 'simply follow orders' because, they ARE responsible for their actions and they need to come to their own personally informed decision as to the validity or otherwise of their actions BEFORE THEY ACT.

To assist you I also refer you to a speech given by Justice Underwood at the below link and I quote a little from it where it refers to the requirement of each 'police' person to make their own decisions because we are all responsible for our own actions and cannot leave the 'ending' up to the magistrate as such:

Reference: Supreme Court of Australia;

To-day, seventeen men and women have just become police constables and joined the police profession. It is a noble profession that will make great demands on those who have just joined it, but it is a profession that will also provide great satisfaction to those who meet these demands willingly.  - - -

In those days the common law of the land regarded the office of police constable as a public office, and the holder of that office as a servant of the Crown. I want you to understand that this is not just a piece of dry, boring history. It is a piece of significant history for each of the graduates now standing on the parade ground. It is significant because in those days the law was that when a police constable exercised his powers – and in those days constables were always "his", - whether those powers were conferred by common law or by an Act of Parliament, he exercised them by virtue of his office.

This meant that each constable was personally responsible for the exercise of his powers. He could not say that he made an arrest because he was ordered to. He was an officer of the Crown, and his power of arrest could not be exercised on the responsibility of any person but himself. If he arrested on suspicion of felony, the suspicion must have been his suspicion, and must have been reasonable to him.

If he arrested in a case in which the arrest may only be made if the constable held a certain view about the case, he and not someone else must hold that view. I stress that the law was that a constable held an office of the Crown and he alone was responsible for its proper exercise. It was a significant responsibility for a constable to know that it was down to him alone to decide whether he would exercise the power of arrest and deprive a person of his or her liberty. A Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia once said that the authority of a police constable is akin to the authority of a master of a ship at sea to maintain order.

It has become a 'common' ERROR of belief by the 'warrior' tribes on earth who use force of arms to interfere, control, enslave, subjugate, extort money and punish or wage war that, - - - the RULES they raise UP as text in books somehow legitimises their ACTIVITIES and somehow nullifies or voids or avoids the LAW OF GOD 'factor.' The factor being THE Law of EQUAL RETURN of the  benign or malignant energy used.

It is my 'pen' to now somehow bring to the attention of all mankind that God's LAW reigns supreme and is immutable and is inviolate as will be seen as man now PAYS for his 'folly' in the manner revealed by ME.

"As you sow so shall ye reap ~ what you do unto others will be done unto you on an EQUAL and thus 'eye for a eye' basis"

It is simply the LAW of ENERGY IN MOTION

'For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction' at the time and in the place the intelligent spiritual energy so decides.

page 6

You are INTENDING to NOT uphold the PEACE. You are an armed person going forth in the name of 'peace' but in fact, you may be asked to disturb the peace of PEACEFUL persons who for 'whatever' reason, do not or cannot conform to the dictates of other mortals who are defying their own rules, (Law) and you then pursue the innocent and cause them HARM.

Please read the below:

 Police Officer Oath

I, (name), swear that I will faithfully execute the office of police officer in Tasmania, and that to the best of my power, without favour or affection, malice or ill-will, will cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against persons and properties in Tasmania, and that to the best of my ability, skill and knowledge will discharge all the duties of a police officer according to law. So help me God.

In the present 'case' against Clemencia instigated by an 'order' issued by 'someone,' they are expecting you to become complicit to a person exceeding their legal mandate through their ignorance or arrogance. You are also expected to disturb 'the' peace and in one 'form' or another cause 'harm or loss or hardship' etc. I hope you can see this because you truly need to simply now UPHOLD THE PEACE and not be 'licensed' by inferior rules to deny your honourable role.

Furthermore, in reference to your 'oath' to "discharge all duties according to the law, - - - so help me God," you need to look at the limited powers aspect granted by THE CONSTITUTION to ALL government officials and the police. I have referred you to the Freedom of religion Acts of the Constitution because:

Ignorantia Juris neminem excusat - Ignorance of The Law excuses no one.

Brother, I am a man who does his very best to assist even the worst criminals and even a murderer would be welcome at my door and be offered a cup of tea even at midnight if I felt that my GOOD counsel would help set his MIND straight.

If the presiding magistrate even 'holds' court on 11th Aug he is carrying out an illegal activity. He and you and all complicit BELIEVE that they are 'above' the LAW, but I AM the ONE who can see AHEAD and I do know what is 'coming' and how the energy of God, being THE REAL LAW, is now to 'balance its books' and more than 'horrendous' is it to be globally, say I.

Bretton: In this Freedom of Religion 'test' case the taxation officials are seeking to set an illegal precedent in a petty court so as to sideline the Constitutional Sovereignty and its 'limits' using the Police PEACE force as their armed 'back up.'

If the Tasmanian judiciary do not 'awaken' to this criminal activity they will ALL become treasonable anarchists who will PAY the ultimate 'price' say I for their collision against God's REPRESENTATIVE (Clemencia) whom they presently seek to CRUCIFY publicly. I hope the POLICE services will awaken to this tragedy before they also consign their own souls to eternal damnation. Police officers need to see that:

1 - Clemencia and all have the CIVIL RIGHT to OBEY the Command of God.
2 - The CIVIL RIGHT to have God as their 'head of house.'
3 - The CIVIL RIGHT to live by their own conscience, faith and belief as along as they do not disturb the peace.
4 - The CIVIL RIGHT to rely on God for their protection rather than the protection of 'armed men.' (Caesar or State)
5 - The CIVIL RIGHT to be as Clemencia is, in conformity to/with the Command of God and the constraints of the Constitutional Freedom of religion ACTS.
6 -
The CIVIL RIGHT to NOT be 'disturbed' by vain or arrogant officers of any taxing or other authority who Clemencia believes is doing the wrong thing in God's eyes.

It follows that ANY state official such as a magistrate or Ed Storace the taxation prosecutor (Or police) attempting to DENY the above is a person following Satan (Dark energy) and they are treasonable anarchists also taking a false wage.

page 7

Bretton, If you are ordered to arrest and detain Clemencia then please  be so kind as to first ask the opinion of your superior officer or the governor of Tasmania and also advise me because, if you do advise me of your intent to arrest Clemencia I would ask you 'WHY' you chose to obey State rules (law) and IGNORE the SUPERIOR LAW granting Clemencia 'clemency' and immunity for NOT disturbing the peace, whereas you intend to go and disturb hers.

Bretton, the ONE you should be 'looking after' is the very PEACEFUL and honourable lady Clemencia, rather than her attackers who are not only using YOU to 'disturb the peace,' but to help them in their COERCIVE attempts to force her against her 'will' to fund their 'darkness in action' against the peaceful.

Bretton, you need to ask yourself now: 1 - Is the magistrate my 'boss' or - - - 2 - Is the Queen's Governor of Tasmania and her Constitutional Law the 'boss' giving me the authority to disturb the peace of the peaceful?

Bretton, our Sovereign ruler God is now judging each and every mortal say I, and I do not wish for you to defy His Command and that of His 'Freedom of Religion' clause of the Constitution and thus DIE spiritually simply because you presently believe that the 'pen' of the magistrate is your boss to be obeyed.

I add, since this case has not been halted by the Queen's Governor of Tasmania, and since the Queen's governor 'office' has not responded to my letter to them dated 24th July, it appears that this land is presently UN-Governed by the Sovereign Queen's representative and thus the CONSTITUTION is UNPROTECTED and 'wide open' to being abused as it has been so for over twenty years by very arrogant people.

I can but hope that the Queen's counsel take steps to honour their obligations and simply ask YOU to be stalwart enough to HONOUR your DUTY to THE PEOPLE rather than to Clemencia's attackers and ignorant magistrates. You Sir are actually employed by THE CROWN and not by any 'magistrate' or decree of his pen.

You Sir are actually employed to UPHOLD THE PEACE and not be 'siding' with disloyal 'mercenaries' who openly DEFY the Constitutional powers simply because they have been 'getting away with it' for YEARS.

If your officers arrest, detain or transport a person illegally, then THE LAW of the Constitution (2) above applies, and you have committed a criminal activity.

If the magistrate punishes or jails or extorts funds through sale of dispossessed property you have become complicit to an illegal activity if you have in any way assisted his 'cause.' There is a consequence within man's Law.

If you do either of the above then within THE Law of God (3) above, being the Law of equal Return of God's energy, you will suffer an EQUAL return of all 'injury' or emotional trauma imposed as punishment upon Clemencia.

That is the ABSOLUTE JUSTICE of God.

The reason why I spend so much TIME for 'free' writing to so many is because I do see and know EXACTLY 'why and how' treasonable officials are to DIE for their anarchist ways for defying the Sovereign Acts of their own Constitution, (2) and thus placing themselves within the punitive aspect of God's immutable Law. (3)

page 8

According to THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2) you should uphold IT as IT stands above State Laws, and you should arrest the magistrate and Eddie Storace the 'complainant' and all complicit to TREASON. 'Why' Bretton would you knowingly join IN with the treasonable 'lynching mob' who defy their own Constitution and their God?

As 'peace-keepers,' you need to ask your advisors; "Why was this 'case' heard and judged on 12th January in the first instance? Why is it now continuing on to be heard a second time in the Launceston Petty Court when it is a constitutional matter of 'faith, belief and religious ideology,' and when the prosecutor and all concerned have been ADVISED of the facts?

Can you Bretton not see that all concerned INTEND to circumvent the legal jurisdiction issue of the High Court so as to set an illegal precedent and thus be able to 'attack' everyone who lives by a peaceful ideology who should be having the protection granted by the Sovereign within the Constitution?

If you are an 'honest cop' then DO YOUR DUTY to THE SOVEREIGN POWERS and to THE PEOPLE. Arrest and detain all defiant of their mandate and their God and already self-proven CRIMINALS.

The reality is that NO State rule or law can be used as the justification to inflict punishment upon a peaceful person living within the Freedom of religion PRINCIPLES who have NOT disturbed the peace, nor are they carrying out any immoral activities. Any magistrate using State rules as their justification to disturb the peace are themselves GUILTY of immoral activities and they need CORRECTION.

There have always been and yet are many magistrates and judges who EXCEED their mandate and authority. Hence my efforts to awaken you so that you can PROTECT the 'well-being' of your officers and the well-being of peaceful citizens as IS YOUR PRIMARY DUTY to both man and God. Please consider all this because it is FOR THE GOOD OF THE POLICE SERVICE.

Clemencia has been told by me to NOT attend the Court because not only is IT and illegal gathering having the INTENT to steal money and cause untold mental and emotional harm, (Terror) but the 'victim' Clemencia was so traumatised at the last 'hearing' in January, that she needed many weeks of good counsel and support, and the presiding magistrate has absolutely no IDEA what she has had to endure over 15 years of persecution, nor what is coming HIS 'way' as God's Wrath unfolds now globally. I will simply pass a letter to the magistrate in the HOPE that he will respond positively and thus save HIMSELF and all complicit an AWFUL LOT OF VERY PAINFUL KARMIC COMEBACK.

It is the time for Police commanders to see that they are NOT 'political lackeys' employed by 'magistrates' or others to be used to DISTURB THE PEACE because they ARE employed by THE Sovereign Crown Authority and funded by THE people to UPHOLD THE PEACE OF THE LAND.

I am very grateful for your replies to me because copies of my responses such as this do get sent out globally to hundreds of other Police personnel as educative material to prepare THEM. This so that they can 'handle' the extraordinary 'insurgency' to now sweep the globe as the MINDS of INDIVIDUALS  are broached telepathically from very dark spirit realms and liquid pain and terror is to explode EVERYWHERE and YOU Sir other community services need to be READY to deal with IT.

I do also hope that you are the man with the courage and capacity to USE the correct laws of the land (Constitutional authority) in respect of the illegal 'charges' brought against Clemencia. Either way the whole world will KNOW of all your decisions ahead because all my correspondence is on line as 'advisory' to all global police and common people.

Commander Bretton Smith, I hope you see the REALITY of this.

I AM the 'conscience' of God on earth entrusted by God to leave God's WISDOM here so that THE YOUTH (You) can get 'back on track' and do the RIGHT THING fearlessly in accordance with God's Command and the Freedom of Religion clause of THE Constitution which gives you ITS mandate to operate.

"Fail' Sir and YOU 'fry.'

In deepest sincerity - Terence

This letter becomes: Update - 42 - 1 Aug 2015: Cdr. Bretton Smith Police Launceston

page 9

Acts which authorise and LIMIT the actions of public servants who work for the institution of government:

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (9th July 1900) section 116

"The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, - and

Constitution Act 1934 (Tasmania) - State Constitutions apply to all states

This document includes a legal guarantee of the religious liberty and equality of Tasmanians. Every citizen is guaranteed freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion under Section 46(1) of this Act.

Part V - General provisions - Religious freedom

46. (1) Freedom of conscience and the free profession and practice of religion are, subject to public order and morality, guaranteed to every citizen.

(2) No person shall be subject to any disability, or be required to take any oath on account of his religion or religious belief.

The question of today is 'What is the meaning of the word 'Religion'?

The Right of and importance of Religious freedom for the citizens of Australia has been clearly affirmed by the rulings of the High Court of Australia where: Justices Mason and Brennan, in a joint judgment, stressed the importance of the case in determining fundamental questions of religious freedom in Australia and the extent to which an individual is free to believe and act without legal restraint.

Justices Mason and Brennan said, "Freedom of religion, the paradigm freedom of conscience, is of the essence of a free society. The chief function in the law of a definition of religion is to mark out an area within which a person subject to the law is free to believe and act in accordance with his belief without legal restraint."

The definition affected the operation of the religious-freedom guarantee under the Constitution and many other laws granting religions special benefits. "Protection is accorded to preserve the dignity and freedom of each man so that he may adhere to any religion of his choosing or to none," they said. "The freedom of religion being equally conferred on all, the variety of religious beliefs which are within the area of legal immunity is not restricted." The judges stressed the importance of "The Actions of the adherents" rather than the dogma itself.

I Terence de Malaherre believe that the word ‘Religion’ is the belief in a superpower entitled to be revered and obeyed and, IT IS THE IDEOLOGICAL CODE OF CONDUCT POLICY as Commanded by the Sovereign Power (God) that is to be obeyed. (Peace & love & mercy & compassion and forgive your enemy)

Note: Australia's own Macquarie dictionary – page 835 (Compact version)

Religion = - - - - the quest for the values of the ideal life - - - the ideal, the practices for attaining the values of the ideal, - - - a system of belief in the worship of a supernatural power or 'God' or, the recognition by man of a superhuman power entitled to total obedience, reverence, and worship.

Religious = - - - - scrupulously faithful, pious, devotion - - - this means that ones 'religion' is not any named 'Church' organisation, but it is the policy of ones daily code of conduct interaction with other children of God. (Peaceful or, controlling, interfering or causing harm)