~ Open letter to Mrs Vanessa Goodwin - Justice minister of Tasmania ~
Reference the validity or otherwise of the Sovereign Constitutional Authority today.
Dear Madam, I write this letter to you because it appears that you are my 'last' source of information on a matter that is of absolute importance not only for every Tasmanian, but in fact for every child of God on this planet, a 'space' in the universe is soon to seethe and writhe in insanity, confrontation and destruction, the 'likes' of which has never before been seen and for reasons known by me.
I see the following words on your web site:
"With a responsible Government that lives within its means, has the right priorities and can be trusted."
The matter at hand is in respect of God's command unto mankind to live at peace with their neighbour and never cause harm and turn the other cheek if assaulted. These words are 'echoed' within the Tasmanian and Australia Constitutions wherein it is apparent to me that the 'powers' granted unto officials of government are LIMITED to a very great extent, albeit they see IT not.
Government officials are limited insofar that IF any person wishes to live by their own conscience, their belief or their religious ideology they are entitled to do so, but more significantly, they are granted protection to so do.
These ACTS are enshrined as LAW so that those absolute pacifists such as myself can live according to our belief or doctrine apart from the 'mainstream' ideological doctrine of control, police protection, punishment and war as long as we are of moral standing and do not disturb the peace of the land.
It is important to understand that the Constitution is supposed to GUARANTEE that these absolute pacifists living their religious belief are NOT TO BE PERSECUTED OR DISADVANTAGED by any officials of the organisation or institution named 'The government of Australia.'
My concerns are due to the fact that the peaceful are being harassed, intimidated and persecuted by officials of the justice department and other government officials. In fact, said officials are imposing their own doctrine forcefully in contravention of the Constitutional Acts.
Constitution Acts. Acts which authorise and LIMIT the actions of public servants:
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (9th July 1900) section 116
"The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, - and
Constitution Act 1934 (Tasmania)
This document includes a legal guarantee of the religious liberty and equality of Tasmanians. Every citizen is guaranteed freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion under Section 46(1) of this Act.
Part V - General provisions - Religious freedom
46. (1) Freedom of conscience and the free profession and practice of religion are, subject to public order and morality, guaranteed to every citizen
(2) No person shall be subject to any disability, or be required to take any oath on account of his religion or religious belief.
So, I ask:
If it is true that the Constitution is in fact the 'leading light' of the legal system which authorises all legislators and subsequent legislation and is the authority to RULE granted unto the government officers by THE CONSTITUTION, it follows that, - - -
The 'Freedom of Religion' Acts above LIMIT the IMPOSITION of some 'subsequent' legislation in that IF a person wishes to 'follow God' and live by their own conscience, belief and ideology they are ENTITLED to so do with no fear that they will be persecuted as long as they are moral and peaceful. - - - So I BELIEVE.
I am 'aware' that all Constitutional matters of 'faith' and religious ideology or conscience can only be 'heard and judged' LEGALLY in the High Court and, - - -
Since state officials are placing Freedom of Religion' cases before magistrates in the lower 'petty' courts who are hearing and judging said cases placed before them ILLEGALLY, then said magistrates and prosecutors are in 'collusion' because they are attempting to coerce people into changing their ideology from that of peace (absolute pacifism) to that of condoning, supporting and funding the contra ideology of control, punishment and war.
The 'crux' of the QUESTIONS I have for you are:
1 - Who is to be the authority bringing said treasonable persons to account?
2 - In your mind, is the authority of the Constitution still valid or has IT become invalid?
3 - If officials and magistrates are usurping the Sovereign Constitutional Authority why is no one 'hauling them in' for a treasonable breach of their own Constitution?
4 - Who or 'which' government 'body' UPHOLDS the Tasmanian and Commonwealth Constitutions. Is it the Justice department or is it the Governor-General's department or is it the 'Queen's' armed forces?
I have been 'testing' the validity of the Freedom of Religion' Act for over fifteen years and I have been doing my best to defend IT and my 'client' an elderly lady living in Launceston. This elderly lady has been and yet is persecuted, intimidated and threatened while also still being coerced into changing her ideological belief by persons in 'high' places who I deem to be treasonable anarchists defiant of their constitutional mandate.
From my enquiries it appears that state officials, court registrars and magistrates have absolutely NO 'interest' in THE Freedom of Religion Act and unfortunately, are 'happy' to remain in ignorance of ITS implications in spite of being informed of their error, and they simply continue 'hearing' all cases brought before their lower 'petty' courts and cause an awful lot of terror, intimidation, harm, loss and suffering to their VICTIMS due to arrogance, vanity and ignorance.
My 'other' question is: "Who can show their invisible God that they are trustworthy and they are faithful to His Word (Peace & love & mercy & compassion) and that they are doing their very best for His children"?
Let it be made quite clear from the outset that there are many TRUE believers such as myself who are absolute pacifists who obey the Command of their God. They also cannot condone, support or fund any person or institution having the conflicting code of conduct policy of using 'armed men' in the activity of control, subjugation, interference, punishment, invasion of property or killing. We believers only fund benign community effort.
Not only this, but absolute pacifists are also of the BELIEF that our God is the Sovereign Monarch, Power and Authority. Thus 'we' do not hold the false belief held by many that a mortal personage, government or ‘council of men’ body is ones lord or master or 'sovereign' to be adored and obeyed. Our peaceful non-intrusive living ways rely solely on the advocacy of our Sovereign Lord, God.
My 'task' is soon done, I have 'unmasked' the presence of the EVIL ONE who rules everyone who wields a sword in defiance of God's Holy Word of 'Peace & Love.'
Each of you who can READ my holy scripture must now choose to WIN or LOSE the FINAL battle for their SOUL. Those who continue to use the forceful power of God to plunder the pockets of His children will FAIL, - - - it is their choice to eternally quail and shriek in anguish.
I am still formulating my final 'complaint' document concerning this matter to the Police minister and yourself but in the meantime, I would be grateful if you would give me a reply to the above so that I can forward a copy of my complaint to the appropriate 'body' in a few days.
My 'finding' on the matter is of the highest importance to everyone, as is the 'response' received from yourself in regard to my four questions above as well as from the recipients of my main outreach 'complaint' you will receive in a few days.
Sincerely - Terence
16th May 2015